Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Yes, this seems to be something missed by many in their recaps of events.
I always wonder when people make posts like this, do they think that completely twisting what the other person said actually fools anyone, or makes for a strong argument? It sure doesn't help with a good discussion.
a. Ginge did not insult BBZ or his company.
b. It is Ginge's opinion that the way poker is taught is over complicated. BBZ took a subjective opinion as an insult.
c. BBZ then melts down publicly over a different subject.
d. Poster states that BBZ did not melt down over the subject that BBZ ranted and raved about but a perceived insult that he did not mention.
Posters hypothesis is not well founded, and the fault for this whole episode lies with BBZ. If he had done his job properly he would not have been frustrated and over reacted.