Quote:
Originally Posted by H0LDiT
Regarding the potential cheating ~
People complain sites dont do anything to stop cheaters & then when they do ,they complain about how they do it.
Its ridiculous.
If GG needs to temporarily freeze accounts to do their 'checks' how can that be a bad thing.
Regarding publicity stunt, it could well be... but even if it was - it may deter people from usng RTA in the future. That cant be a bad thing either.
I'm all for sites doing everything they can to counter cheaters. Given GG's shady track record, however, I highly doubt they suddenly came up with an advanced RTA detection algorithm.
First off, it's pretty difficult to just flat out determine whether a 'GTO play' has occurred. NLHE is far from solved; what constitutes 'GTO' is all relative to the parameters you pass to the solver. Even if the site has solutions to every known spot for 10 different bet sizings, it depends what level of granularity they use when assessing a user's play. Does cbetting range on a dry board disqualify someone from being investigated for RTA because they could get .1% more EV mixing between 200% overbet and check back? Or, considering the more likely end the spectrum, can GG just ban anyone who doesn't make absolutely massive mistakes because they're playing too close to GTO? Secondly, assuming someone does get flagged as a 'GTO player', how on earth do they go about proving they were using RTA? If the guy has 2 PCs and isn't stupid, there's absolutely no way of detecting it.
Overall, this sounds more like another flimsy excuse for GG to ban whomever they please under the guise of their predatory ToS.