He should still be careful but it won’t save him from his previous Twitter posts. He’s still getting sued and losing

What’re the defamation suits? Who else is suing him for defamation?

I went from 80% cheating to now 100%.

Gman likely saved people lots of money as I bet Rabia/Jacob/Bryan were just getting started.

Endless love to Gman for donating 135k to Big Brother/Big Sister.

I'm having trouble understanding Beanz perceived role in this. He provided the $ and masterminded it?

The top three calls for poker mediation, Tom Dwan, Haraolobob and Deeb, all believe she was cheating.

Imagine fading the professional analysis of those three.

I don't have a dog in this fight, but if you watch the stream, she is talking to the dealer when she says that last line. She folded her hand, and the dealer said "it's free to check", and gave her her cards back, and she said "oh... oh... well now they know"... meaning that the rest of the table now knows she has a bad hand.

Also, in regards to the rest of the transcription for this exchange, I'm not sure that it's an accurate representation. For instance, the audio is a little unclear, but to me it sounds like she is clearly saying "totally fine", instead of "it'll be fine".

Given the context of the full discussion taking place at this time, and a closer listen, I think this is a more accurate description of what happened:

3:16:04

Robbi: "... like the (thing/deal/agreement?) we had was that he was going to come back down and take a b... chill... take a breather... he lost a big pot, he got it back... take a breather and just chill out. But he didn't, because... then..."

(I'm assuming she motioned towards RIP at this point, implying that RIP's involvement stopped G from returning, which made RIP get flustered/defensive about his actions.)

RIP: "da uh wh... why am I upset?" (To me, this was RIP justifying his involvement, after Robbi seemingly criticized it.)

Robbi: "Totally fine..." (To me, this is Robbi letting him know that she didn't intend to criticize him.)

Then the dealer hands her cards back, and the dealer/Robbi say what I wrote in the beginning of this post.

Again, I have no dog in this fight, just clarifying the "now they know" line, and giving my interpretation of the full exchange... I think the "why am I upset?" line was a rhetorical question, meant to justify his actions.

Garrett too chickenshit and self interested to acknowledge that. Robbi and Rip and Beanz and Nikki Airball are much softer targets..

All good. Yea I was misunderstanding I guess.

But her play on stream is being used as “evidence” including the J8 hand. Do you find that to be a suspicious hand? If so, why?

And hearsay.

Beanz finna drive a lionel up yo azz

Extremely suspicious hand. It’s circumstantial evidence tho. The only tangible evidence you elude to can be found by a through HCL investigation.

I was pretty pissed watching that stream after the hand. I could not believe they weren’t shutting the game down and checking everyone at the table for anything suspicious. I’m guessing it was to avoid legal issues but it’s starting to become possible IMO that several people from the inside could be in on the fix. Hence the no pressing of the issue at the necessary time

For instance in the UB cheating scandal it started out with some suspicious hands. But that wasn’t enough. The true hammer of guilt happened when inside info from an employee revealed one of the suspected cheating names had changed their username to another one of the suspected cheating names. And later that the physical address of one of the cheating accounts belonged to Russ Hamilton. All of this required inside help

All of these smears are transparent. Dwan is being clear and making perfect sense, even if you disagree with him you can certainly understand him.

Looks like a fall guy to me as well.

Also how you gonna let the game run with all these security problems. Vertucci had to of known about all the scamming.

I can admit I was less than 50% cheating before the chip palming info. However, my initial reaction after reading Garetts post is that the strategy involved was that ONLY GARRETT was to be cheated. No cheating on others. See NIK AIRBALLS animosity towards Garrett on Twitter. And this is probably an easy way to stave off cheating accusations as everyone has learned from Postlegate (always making the right play is a dead giveaway). Also, in the hand where she calls off when GMan has a boat, she knows she is behind but thinks she can win a big pot if she hits her flush. This is consistent with the….does not know the hole cards but receives info if she is ahead or behind….I am in the way over 50% now camp.

I also think that Garrett being 100% absolutely convinced she was cheating immediately after it happened is not a good look for Garrett. The only way you know 100% sure someone is cheating is if you yourself are cheating. Reference a scene from the movie The Sting where they setup a true cold deck. I am not calling Garrett a cheater, but I am just saying some people might see it that way (I am referencing some posts I saw on this thread).

I also think Garrett handled this somewhat poorly. He should have escrowed the funds. He should have not come out and said she is 100% absolutely cheating. But I think this happened so fast he might be given some leeway on that.

Has anyone gone through the footage and also found that Garrett was the only one being cheated? Just a thought.

Oh please tell me why it was suspicious, she was behind every step of way and called 10K drawing dead on turn

I am 99% sure cheating went on, I don't know enough about this guy in particular to make a judgement either way but they really aren't doing a great job of asking this guy pointed questions.
Seems like a wasted opportunity.

Feel at this point, gman should delete the stuff about Beanz. It sounds some of it is wrong and most of it is just random speculation based on the fact Beanz helped her get on the show and initially defended her.

You failed to answer my question at all and just responded with dribble. You are not thinking rationally and have convinced yourself she is cheating just because she said some suspicious things by changing her story. That is not genuine evidence of cheating at all. People change their stories for all sorts of silly reasons that have nothing to do with cheating.

Edit: my bad didn’t realize you weren’t talking about the J4 hand

In the J8 vs Q4 hand you’re right, that hand shows no signs of cheating. But if all you had to do was not use the cheating tool every hand and you’d get away with it, that’d be a small price to pay. Doesn’t mean you can discount the possibility of someone cheating

o.o

Because that proves they’re very sophisticated at cheating.

Which might not make sense given the hand that started it all, but that’s what I’m hearing.

So you have nothing, got it

Btw Bart Hanson analyzed that hand and found nothing suspicious, in fact it lends credence that the J4 hand was legit

Anyone else wish to say why the J8 hand was suspicious?

I hate to think how many times I've been cheated by basic signalling in my years of poker.

Good for you Gman.

Glad you trusted your gut and figured out the truth.

Multiple Postle hands would be convincing evidence, so would evidence of some communication device. The fact there is only 1 hand is basically a smoking gun for her innocence which the cheat crew keep ignoring. I keep mentioning it because its a [B]huge[B]deal. Its not plausible they only cheated once in 600 hands. We don't need the same amount of postle hands, he was cheating consistently.

He pretty resoundingly debunked the whole robbing a casino angle. But that Robbi staked him and he was how she got on the show, and DGAF was the contact between them, seems relevant to the situation. It is a little strange that he didn’t know her but she loaned him 20k, and he isn’t really be forthcoming about these particular details.

Also, he initially defended her, and said she shouldn’t have given the money back. Anyone that is an experienced poker player that feels this way is suspect to me because their judgement is very unlikely to be this bad.

I’m behind on the stream right now but he’s still saying Garrett should give the money back. Anyone involved in this that is saying that is suspicious to me.

What? So playing hands exactly as if they weren’t getting knowledge is proof that they were getting knowledge? Lol