Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Garrett Adelstein Report on Likely Cheating on Hustler Casino Live Garrett Adelstein Report on Likely Cheating on Hustler Casino Live

10-12-2022 , 04:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by starlord80
This has been a wildly entertaining forum to read. Have not read it all, but was wondering if this point has been talked over.
If there was an inside man the conversation most of went like this.

Ring Leader: We have an inside guy that can read the hole cards he will signal in strong/weak hands. He takes a 15k cut.

Ring Players: Ok, we can just pay him the 15k in cash sometime after the game?

Ring Leader: No, he is going to palm the 15k off your stack in front of all the cameras.
Ad Nauseam.

tin foil -pro cheating camp A, argue this proves Robbie was cheating.

tin foil -pro cheating camp B, argue this proves Robbie was cheating, but not very good at it.

no tin foil - anti cheating camp, argue this suggests Bryan spotted Robbie was not bothered about winning or losing money so would not be certain of her chip size, so a good time to remove a few.
10-12-2022 , 04:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by st86
Thank you for trying to explain. If you look at various videos of the hand, after she calls someone at the table asks her "do you have a set of 3s" - and she says "no". He then proceeds to ask "do you have a 3?" and again she immediately says "no".

I totally understand misreading a hand, it happens to all of us. But it is clearly not what happened here.
Not sure thats 100% correct to be honest. The pocket 3s question is correct but i think the additional 3 comment is being made by someone else as she is answering the pocket 3s question.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pR_PWVGUMVQ

Its at 2:11:48
10-12-2022 , 04:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by st86
Thank you for trying to explain. If you look at various videos of the hand, after she calls someone at the table asks her "do you have a set of 3s" - and she says "no". He then proceeds to ask "do you have a 3?" and again she immediately says "no".

I totally understand misreading a hand, it happens to all of us. But it is clearly not what happened here.

I misread your comment, ironic, so will try again, this one, not the first one!

Well, if she said this after she called the 109k it might be she did not want to reveal she believed she had a 3 then. Or looked at her hand after the call, prior to being asked these questions and realised it was a 4, not a 3. Who knows. We don't know what happened, it might be Robbie does not either.

Some are certain she believed she had a 3 and others certain she realised she had a 4, prior to calling the 109k. The sensible position is to entertain both options.

Last edited by mike tommo; 10-12-2022 at 04:17 AM.
10-12-2022 , 04:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike tommo
I don't follow your point, if she believed she had a 3, and believed this 3 might enable her to win the hand, then presumably if someone
asks her if she is going to have one she might deny this. If Garrett thought she had a 3 he might have checked, not raised it 109k. Or she might say she does, hoping Garrett would then fold, so she can at least win a smaller hand.

Poker players say they have this or that to try and fool, bluff, confuse ...don't they?
Tbf - the question was asked after Garret was all in so her answering the question was of no consequence apart from the fact she didnt need to answer at all of course.
10-12-2022 , 04:17 AM
Let's not forget that this isn't the first time when someone had misread their hand but still won the pot and gave the money back because they felt bad winning the pot. And this was televised as well.
10-12-2022 , 04:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VegasRanger1872
Not sure thats 100% correct to be honest. The pocket 3s question is correct but i think the additional 3 comment is being made by someone else as she is answering the pocket 3s question.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pR_PWVGUMVQ

Its at 2:11:48
Thanks for replying. The conversation goes like this:

"Do you have pocket 3?"
"**** no"
"But you have a 3 in your hand right?"
"No, this is a pure bluff catcher"

Tommo - This takes place after she called already.
10-12-2022 , 04:22 AM
What is a Cheatspiracy Wrecking Ball?
10-12-2022 , 04:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike tommo
Ad Nauseam.

tin foil -pro cheating camp A, argue this proves Robbie was cheating.

tin foil -pro cheating camp B, argue this proves Robbie was cheating, but not very good at it.

no tin foil - anti cheating camp, argue this suggests Bryan spotted Robbie was not bothered about winning or losing money so would not be certain of her chip size, so a good time to remove a few.
All this kind of got me thinking about conspiracy theories. I was thinking today that all conspiracy theories are chipping away at the Ultimate Conspiracy Theory.

The Ultimate Conspiracy Theory is something like: The world says I'm not especially bright, knowledgeable or special. And if I ever wanted to hold my own on say, politics, it would require hundreds of hours of study. But I seem so bright, knowledgeable and special to myself, and badly want to be so. And I don't want to study for hundreds of hours. Therefore, everybody is wrong. Shills. Pawns of the lizard people. And certainly spending hundreds of hours on Reddit with like-minded people is far more valuable than wasting time grappling with difficult books by experts and geniuses. Yes, it is actually me and people like me who can see the real truth. LOL, everyone else is so dumb.
10-12-2022 , 04:28 AM
A light bulb just went off in my pea brain head. When Bryan wrote the letter to Robbi and referred to Gman as "cry baby Garret", what he is saying is Bryan would have never been caught if Garrett hadn't complained about the j4 hand which set off this investigation and ultimately led to Hustler reviewing tapes.
10-12-2022 , 04:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jpro72717172
Let's not forget that this isn't the first time when someone had misread their hand but still won the pot and gave the money back because they felt bad winning the pot. And this was televised as well.
Interesting, who and when was this?
10-12-2022 , 04:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HexBreaker
All this kind of got me thinking about conspiracy theories. I was thinking today that all conspiracy theories are chipping away at the Ultimate Conspiracy Theory.

The Ultimate Conspiracy Theory is something like: The world says I'm not especially bright, knowledgeable or special. And if I ever wanted to hold my own on say, politics, it would require hundreds of hours of study. But I seem so bright, knowledgeable and special to myself, and badly want to be so. And I don't want to study for hundreds of hours. Therefore, everybody is wrong. Shills. Pawns of the lizard people. And certainly spending hundreds of hours on Reddit with like-minded people is far more valuable than wasting time grappling with difficult books by experts and geniuses. Yes, it is actually me and people like me who can see the real truth. LOL, everyone else is so dumb.

A fair bit of research has been carried out into the ''tinfoil'' brain, or a lot in the last 10-20yrs. (just google Conspiracy Ideation).The thrust of the Psychological papers is these folks seek order, which is more comforting. So, with the Robbie situation, it is preferable to think there is a conspiracy as opposed to a person behaving irrationally, or chaotically. Plus conspiracy psyches tend to need a scapegoat or persons to blame.
10-12-2022 , 04:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VegasRanger1872
Tbf - the question was asked after Garret was all in so her answering the question was of no consequence apart from the fact she didnt need to answer at all of course.
Yes, we clarified that now. The poster did not stipulate when in the hand this was initially, and I'd forgotten. So the only consequence of her answers would be how she believed these might be perceived once the hand played out.
10-12-2022 , 04:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike tommo
Interesting, who and when was this?
I'd have to look up the name of the show. It was sponsored by PokerStars. Line up was Negreanu, Charlie Carrol, Faraz Jakka, Liv Boree, Kevin Hart, and a random amateur. Very similar concept as the loose cannon show. Pretty sure it was a 5 episode stream and it's on YouTube. Probably happened about 4-5 years ago.

The loose cannon bluffed with complete air and Kevin Hart called with King high i believe. As soon as he showed his hand, he said he misread it. She said you're still good. Kevin felt so bad because he knew he shouldn't have won the hand so he gave it back to her.

Basically, really rich people have no regard for money, lol

Edit.. Found it on YouTube. Search Kevin Hart wins and gives cash back

Last edited by Jpro72717172; 10-12-2022 at 04:56 AM.
10-12-2022 , 04:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by st86
Thanks for replying. The conversation goes like this:

"Do you have pocket 3?"
"**** no"
"But you have a 3 in your hand right?"
"No, this is a pure bluff catcher"

Tommo - This takes place after she called already.
So, do you think the idea saying after the hand she believed she had a 3 was an understandable way of explaining the fact she called, or a way of making her call look more sensible, knowing in fact she had a 4 prior to the call.?
10-12-2022 , 05:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jpro72717172
I'd have to look up the name of the show. It was sponsored by PokerStars. Line up was Negreanu, Charlie Carrol, Faraz Jakka, Liv Boree, Kevin Hart, and a random amateur. Very similar concept as the loose cannon show. Pretty sure it was a 5 episode stream and it's on YouTube. Probably happened about 4-5 years ago.

The loose cannon bluffed with complete air and Kevin Hart called with King high i believe. As soon as he showed his hand, he said he misread it. She said you're still good. Kevin felt so bad because he knew he shouldn't have won the hand so he gave it back to her.

Basically, really rich people have no regard for money, lol

Edit.. Found it on YouTube. Search Kevin Hart wins and gives cash back
Thanks, I'll have a look. You do hear stories quite often that when poker players have a bad night/run of luck, others will give them a few chips or dollars to allow them to carry on playing or afford the private jet back home!
10-12-2022 , 05:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike tommo
Thanks, I'll have a look. You do hear stories quite often that when poker players have a bad night/run of luck, others will give them a few chips or dollars to allow them to carry on playing or afford the private jet back home!
I just got done re-watching it. The similarities are eerily similar. From the announcers saying he can't make the call to Kevin saying he wants her to stay in the game so here's 15k.

The main difference is Kevin had the same reaction as the rest of would have had if we misread our hand. Obviously Robbi didn't want to react that way because she didn't want the table to know she's not very good at poker, lol
10-12-2022 , 05:10 AM
Look I've given up on following other stuff, but that dealer who swiped 15k should have been charged.

https://www.pokernews.com/news/2022/...gsal-42269.htm
10-12-2022 , 05:10 AM
"As I left, Sagbigsal got out and stood in the street taking photos of my car and of me. When I rolled down my window to ask why, and if he knew Robbi, he said: “We’re gonna be following you if you don’t leave now. So you better leave before I follow you wherever you’re going.”
10-12-2022 , 05:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fragglerock45
Look I've given up on following other stuff, but that dealer who swiped 15k should have been charged.

https://www.pokernews.com/news/2022/...gsal-42269.htm
Agreed. Bryan is pissed at Garrett because he cried foul which is what started this investigation and ultimately led to Hustler catching Bryan stealing the chips.

It's all making sense now.
10-12-2022 , 05:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fragglerock45
Look I've given up on following other stuff, but that dealer who swiped 15k should have been charged.

https://www.pokernews.com/news/2022/...gsal-42269.htm
He is being charged. Gardena Police are taking Robbis phone as evidence of a confession tomorrow when she gets back to LA from LV. She has named the lead detective.
10-12-2022 , 05:27 AM
So Robbi either misread her hand or intentionally tried to lose to Garrett so she would be guaranteed a seat anytime she wanted by calling with Jack high. She was using Rip's money so this makes even more sense.

But Garrett flipped out so she decided to give the money back to appease the star of the show. Garrett wouldn't have flipped out if Eric P. was not at the table. Garrett was the only one who thought there was cheating. Now he's been feeling guilty about the situation evident by him donating the money to charity.

Hopefully he can admit he was wrong and apologize to everyone involved and more importantly, he needs to apologize to all of his fans that he manipulated into making them believe that Garrett was a victim.

The only positive with Garrett's actions is that they caught Bryan stealing chips from players.

I solved the case, am I eligible for the bounty, lol
10-12-2022 , 05:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jpro72717172
A light bulb just went off in my pea brain head. When Bryan wrote the letter to Robbi and referred to Gman as "cry baby Garret", what he is saying is Bryan would have never been caught if Garrett hadn't complained about the j4 hand which set off this investigation and ultimately led to Hustler reviewing tapes.
when she went on tilt a bit tonight on joeys show she used the words "cry baby garret" again
10-12-2022 , 05:41 AM
My curiosity has been satisfied. Remember, sickest call of all time.
10-12-2022 , 05:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike tommo
So, do you think the idea saying after the hand she believed she had a 3 was an understandable way of explaining the fact she called, or a way of making her call look more sensible, knowing in fact she had a 4 prior to the call.?
Yes, and i can totally get why she wanted to save face, especially after she realized how terrible / insane that call was.

What i don't understand is why 4 days later (on Joey's show) she switched to saying she knew her hand (after the transcript i included above was found, along with other indications)

And i also don't understand why today on Joey's show she said the following:

"I 100% thought i had a 3"
"I was told i can't run with that story because i looked at my hand"

I just find it extremely strange that she would go back to that. I mostly brought this up because everyone here was praising this Alex guy for "destroying the pro-cheater camp" when his main argument was she misread her hand. She clearly didn't. Why is she lying again now? She must think everyone is stupid.
10-12-2022 , 05:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomHimself
when she went on tilt a bit tonight on joeys show she used the words "cry baby garret" again
Wow

      
m