I really have been trying to explain to you people what that report actually was...



C'mon, tools...

Maybe you should try using words rather than your surreal art to explain.

Since paying out of one’s pocket is egregious , who should pay for the research?

Yeah when I asked them before who should have paid the collective “uhhh duhh” was deafening.

Whatever it is, clean report, passed lie detector test, no one interested in 250K, they just come up with excuses

That’s not at all what the report concluded but I think you know that. Or maybe you’re just actually an idiot. Probs 70/30

Real Billy Mitchell vibes in this thread.

I was on the more likely than not cheated side and still am. Nothing has really changed in the situation, and nothing has explained the numerous suspicious events and falsehoods she told.

When I said the report ended as expected, that's in reference to the fact that the majority of people on both sides of the issue expected them not to find any conclusive evidence. But as mentioned in the report itself, it's still possible cheating did occur, and they found many vulnerabilities that would allow it to take place, they just didn't find evidence it happened.

The best and possibly only time to find conclusive evidence would have been the night of the incident, but understandably IMO they didn't pursue it that aggressively. HCL doesn't have the authority to detain, interrogate, and search players based on an accusation by another player alone. And that's not really conducive to building a welcoming environment for high stakes players anyway.

haven't been following closely, can someone give me a summary that confirms my own bias?

thanks in advance

No report can prove innocence. At some point evidence needs to brought forward. Can’t just say “well she could have cheated!” forever.

It’s about time a certain guy gives a certain lady her money back and apologized, this has gone on far too long.

A recreational player makes a single, crazy decision at a poker table, which happens thousands of times every day in poker rooms across the world.

It should have been interesting for a week tops.

From that 2 plus 2 is able to generate 15,000 replies in a thread. Impressive ... in a bad way.

How many J high calls has Robbi made since the hand in question? I'm going to guess 0. Maybe she just intensely studied Garret and was indeed playing the man. How many J high calls for 250k pots have you seen in the history of televised poker? Probably quite a few since you've been following poker for least 14 years.

Well to be fair, there'd be closer to 8,000 posts in this thread without people unironically posting in this thread, just to criticize others for posting in this thread.

Call wasn’t due to intensive study and playing the man, she just simply got over invested in the hand emotionally.

And the first time sometime happens doesn’t make it cheating

You're right and that's why I'm not 100% sure of cheating. As for why Robbi made the call, that's still up in the air since she gave multiple conflicting reasons. Maybe she clarified in her latest 2hr interview with Vertucci which I'll admit I didn't sit through.

if you had any brains you would be able to work out why she made the call, yourself about 3 months ago. ..

Here ya go.

Right, it's because Garrett, Ivey, and Lauren sabotaged the RFID so that Robbi would get orders to call with a hand that didn't make sense in order to expose the fact that she was cheating.

The way he said "****'s about to hit the fan" gave me really high hopes, but then he just racked up his chips and disappeared off the face of the earth.

When an action is based on emotion and not logic someone not being able to explain why they did what they did is exactly what you would expect.

I wouldn’t watch that interview if it was 30 seconds so I can’t add anything on that

couldnt have said it better myself

Clean report? LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooo

Oh there was evidence Robbi cheated? Point it out to me

I don’t care about HCL

Yep, this is one of the clearly malafide accounts.

what I would pay to get an inside glance of the thought process going on in this guy's head when he's considering what images and texts to use on his next meme