Quote:
Originally Posted by Skallagrim
I get your point too, but I think you are not fully accounting for the fact that the government is hardly one huge intertwined operation. The DOJ has no idea whether you owe taxes on this money or not. The IRS might be able to figure it out given enough time and enough manpower, but fat chance of that actually happening. And it is highly doubtful the DOJ is going to delay FTP remissions in order to wait for the IRS to assess a possible tax withholding.
Which is not to say that it is impossible that someday, somewhere, some player could find themselves in a position, most likely at a random audit, where the IRS is aware that the player got paid, say, $100,000 in FTP remission but never declared gambling winnings on his/her taxes. Ouch. But it is to say that such a situation is not likely to be a routine result of this process.
Skallagrim
Totally agree with you that one hand of the government doesn't know what the other is doing, and that there are "separate" governmental agencies. Agreed that they couldn't decide on a case by case basis whether a victim had profit, whether they paid taxes on such profit.
Just saying that there have been remission cases before where some of the money for some of the victims are somewhat related to profits (not that the remission itself is a profit.) I think looking to those past remissions cases gives a more accurate prediction than interpretations of tax professionals, even if they tend to all agree with each other.
If they have never withheld a percentage for taxes in a remissions case, they (likely) won't here.
If they always withhold a percentage for taxes in a remissions case that has a similar proximity to a profit situation, they (likely) will here.
Don't think they're going to decide if they will withhold on this case. I think they long ago decided if they ever withhold or not.