Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300)

05-05-2020 , 05:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pk1d
Moving to party was a mistake. Not being able to follow the result live really takes away from the viewer experience. Why would we want to watch two people, one of them completely unknown, play with cards that we can't see, with a result that we don't know? Imagine watching the last day of the Veni match without knowing the score.
I mean we know the reason for moving there and it seems perfectly reasonable. It is however pretty surprising that their combined brainpower hasn't yet managed to find a way to display it. Tracking PG's balance shouldn't be too big of a deal.
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-05-2020 , 05:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stlls
I mean we know the reason for moving there and it seems perfectly reasonable. It is however pretty surprising that their combined brainpower hasn't yet managed to find a way to display it. Tracking PG's balance shouldn't be too big of a deal.
I am no expert, but I assume because they do not have real time access to hand data then there is no (legit) way to do it other than manually.

This is will be made exponentially harder by the fact that both players have auto-rebuy to 100bb's on, meaning they are updating table stack totals a lot.
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-05-2020 , 05:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuma
it's technologically possible to track phil's results in real time.
Even if they don't want to go down this route I'd be surprised if Party wouldn't hook them up. Considering the free advertising they are getting out of the challenge you would have thought they would have already offered.
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-05-2020 , 09:01 PM
Why the reason for playing on party?
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-05-2020 , 09:08 PM
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-05-2020 , 10:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuma
it's technologically possible to track phil's results in real time.
i really hate no live results + no posts of bb/100 results. unwatchable. unsubbed. trach crapp
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-05-2020 , 11:57 PM
ActionFreak up 75,6k this session
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-06-2020 , 04:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickroll
am not watching but...

what is the commentary "zomg he just 3bet my life roll" every hand?

i don't see why being a plo20 grinder would disqualify him from being a quality commentator, just say he sucks at commentary for specific reasons based on his commentary

but frankly, you're unlikely to get an active nosebleed grinder willing to "give away free coaching" so it's going to be active plo20, retired guys or people like norman chad and stapes
Doesn't have to be nosebleeds, just someone that has played HUPLO at low midstakes level, or a solver expert etc. So they know what's going on and can assume the role of serious answering person.

I think it's totally fine have a guy go zomg he "3 bet life roll" even overplay it, but do it when you have an expert there for comedic purposes so he can "set you straight"
- That's Stapes and tuch's job though
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-06-2020 , 08:10 AM
Is there any rules for not using trackers?
They ARE probably using trackers, right?

Because if they are using trackers, Phil could share the results real time on the stream with the software.
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-06-2020 , 08:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vini.barbosa
Is there any rules for not using trackers?
They ARE probably using trackers, right?

Because if they are using trackers, Phil could share the results real time on the stream with the software.
What do you mean? You can't use hem/pt while playing. Or do you mean they are using illegal trackers during this challenge? And you are saying Phil should prove this by sharing the results while playing? Seems kind of dumb.
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-06-2020 , 10:09 AM
It seems fairly obvious that PG should simply advance AF $1m on RIO and get back to playing there.
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-06-2020 , 01:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Haven
It seems fairly obvious that PG should simply advance AF $1m on RIO and get back to playing there.
There might be regulatory problems with doing this.
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-06-2020 , 04:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ballin4life
There might be regulatory problems with doing this.
If it came from Phil's pocket then it's just a player to player transfer. If it's company money then it's obviously a different matter.
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-06-2020 , 05:06 PM
Phil ran pretty well again playing jungleman today on RIO, up 100k in 750 hands...
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-06-2020 , 05:12 PM
Yeah I had the same thought. That massive cooler where AF had quads and lost might have felt too sketchy and even if he doesn't really suspect any foul play, it's in the back of his mind. In those spots it's better to do whatever you have to do to get peace of mind.
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-06-2020 , 06:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otp
Single raised pots have 6BB pots on flop.
FYI - fixed. Example:

Run It Once Poker - HU PLO (€150/€300) - 2020/04/28 19:50 UTC
Galfond Challenge Hand Converter by Eponymous

Phil Galfond (SB/BTN): 130.4 BB
ActionFreak (BB): 446.9 BB


SB posts SB (0.5 BB), BB posts BB (1 BB)

Preflop: (pot: 1.5 BB)
PG raises 2 BB to 3 BB, V calls 2 BB

Flop: (6 BB) 4 A Q
V checks, PG bets 4.1 BB, V raises 9.3 BB to 13.4 BB, PG calls 9.3 BB

Turn: (32.8 BB) K
V bets 32.8 BB, PG calls 32.8 BB

River: (98.5 BB) 6
V bets 98.5 BB, PG calls 81.1 BB (all-in)

ActionFreak shows 3 A 8 5 for Flush A K Q 5 4
ActionFreak wins 260.7 BB
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-07-2020 , 07:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by slothmancometh
Yeah I had the same thought. That massive cooler where AF had quads and lost might have felt too sketchy and even if he doesn't really suspect any foul play, it's in the back of his mind. In those spots it's better to do whatever you have to do to get peace of mind.
Would u be so kind and post me the hand, cant find it.

Anyone?

thaaanx
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-07-2020 , 08:23 AM
Don't post the hand! No one has the right to think critically! The one who does it is a primitive conspiracy theorist!
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-07-2020 , 01:05 PM
Loving the commentating today.
Actual comments and analysis of the hands
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-07-2020 , 04:01 PM
Gayler chucking up hands on Vision in real time to use in hand analysis is pretty sick.
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-07-2020 , 04:11 PM
Richard Gayler is an awesome commentator.
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-07-2020 , 04:54 PM
+1 to not stapes hooray
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-07-2020 , 05:21 PM
Couldn't agree more.
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-07-2020 , 05:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clayton
+1 to not stapes hooray
Yeah, Stapes is horrendous IMO. Makes it unwatchable for me.
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote
05-08-2020 , 09:38 AM
ActionFreak is taking a day off today

https://twitter.com/RunchuksP/status...27196664958977

(how the f to embed a Twitter post?)

Last edited by lix8; 05-08-2020 at 09:39 AM. Reason: Link
The Galfond Challenge - Match 3 (ActionFreak @ 150/300) Quote

      
m