Quote:
Originally Posted by timtowdi
"[Pokerstars is] the most efficient and ruthless rake gathering machine ever created. [...] but Full Tilt is an organization run by poker players, with sympathy for the wellbeing of the overall poker community."
I dont see how Full Tilt is any less ruthless in their rake gathering prowess, and I also don't see how Full Tilt has any more sympathy for the wellbeing of the poker economy than Pokerstars.
With that said, the wellbeing and sustainability of the poker economy should be the #1 focus by any Poker operation. Online operaters have the option of making it exponentially more sustainable by lowering the rake at small/micro-stakes, but to date, not a single online site has done this.
Is PokerStars' rake not lower -- across all games, levels and tourneys -- than that charged by FullTilt, UB and Party Poker? If I am incorrect, my apologies; but, if I am not is this not just another argument for BA to just shut up. These dumb smart-guys are making me puke.