Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy

11-19-2015 , 10:24 PM
So with the two best players of the past year facing off today, it seemed like bet sizing strategy became a big part of the competition, when contestants had an opportunity to set their own wager?

Spoiler:


Alex got off to an early start, with a run of correct answers - so then when he hit the Daily Double in the category of 'Recent Bestsellers', he chose to bet everything when stacks looked like this ...

Matt: $600
Alex: $5000
Kerry: $0




Alex answered 'Who is Bloom', and was correct! Matt was then able to get a bit of something going to help narrow the gap, but Alex still held the lead by quite a bit going into the second half. Where he managed to hit a Second Daily Double (accidentally erased the screen cap of the categories, so not sure what it was for this question?) - Alex bet it all again, with everybody's stacks looking like this, and the audience let out a huge gasp

Matt: $4000
Alex: $15,200
Kerry: $1,800




Alex answered 'South Padre Island' and was correct again, so by risking everything and answering the question correctly, he was able to build up a gigantic lead. Which was really helpful, because when Matt hit the second Daily Double and bet $5,000, he was still pretty behind after correctly answering 'Aristotle' (?) Stacks at the time were around ..

Matt: $5,600
Alex: $26,800
Kerry: $3,000




So going into Final Jeopardy, stacks looked like this with the category being 'French Novel Title Heroes'




And here was the question, along with what each of the contestants chose to wager, and their answers:










Think the answer was 'The Count of Monte Cristo'? So this is how stacks look from today





Guess today's totals get added to tomorrow's?
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-19-2015 , 10:25 PM
Not sure if this has been posted, but for Jeopardy fans, this is a pretty cool read. It analyzes why Ken Jennings' streak is untouchable.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...-rest-of-time/
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-19-2015 , 10:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerFan2008
no way those other two can run him down tomorrow.
I wouldn't say that
"Matt Jackson is a 23-year-old paralegal from Washington, D.C., who won $411,612 in 13 Jeopardy games — the fourth best all-time total in regular-season episodes"

I do agree Alex has a big advantage but Matt is no slouch and underperformed in thursday's game, Alex might want to keep his lead and be a bit risk-averse if he hits a DD, Matt on the other hand will know that he has to gamble big in all Daily Doubles and Final Jeopardy.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-19-2015 , 11:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xalas
I wouldn't say that
"Matt Jackson is a 23-year-old paralegal from Washington, D.C., who won $411,612 in 13 Jeopardy games — the fourth best all-time total in regular-season episodes"

I do agree Alex has a big advantage but Matt is no slouch and underperformed in thursday's game, Alex might want to keep his lead and be a bit risk-averse if he hits a DD, Matt on the other hand will know that he has to gamble big in all Daily Doubles and Final Jeopardy.
Get real, ur boy Matt was owned by AJ, AJ is playing optimum strat, and has way to big a lead .....game over
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-19-2015 , 11:30 PM
Tomorrow to become a Jeopardy legend, can't wait to watch Matt squirm a little. Up there with Roger Craig, gg Alex.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-19-2015 , 11:30 PM
Great game all around by Alex. Matt got on track after a slow start, had to wager big in FJ but missed.

Huge leads in tournament finals have been run down many times before, see the links on today's jboard thread for examples.

Totals on Jeopardy are not called stacks. I've always wondered why poker players use poker terms to describe a myriad of other events. But I digress.....
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-19-2015 , 11:42 PM
I dunno if this was already posted. It's about Matt:

"Jeopardy’s most GIF-able human is back for this week’s finale"

http://www.theverge.com/2015/11/19/9...kson-dat-smile
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-19-2015 , 11:42 PM
spirit fingers got tilted and couldn't recover when he saw how on point alex's buzzer game was

episode is already on primewire for those who want to watch.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 02:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerFan2008
Get real, ur boy Matt was owned by AJ, AJ is playing optimum strat, and has way to big a lead .....game over
*sign* Matt isn't my pick, I'm pulling for Alex, You seem not to understand why you never underestimate your opponent and the advantages of coming from behind.
an example of that was Alex's zero wager at the end of round 1, yes A smart move but understand his motive and the risk it entails (if Matt had wagered everything and got it right you would be very near Alex's total)
Having a lead can cause paralysis it happen in sports, it happens in poker, the person playing from behind has to increase variance which can be a bonanza or bust while the person with the lead wishes to preserve it. obviously Alex has great advantage but it far from a sure thing.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 02:29 AM
Seems like Matt bet $5000 instead of $5600 only because $5k is a nice round number.

Last edited by 27AllIn; 11-20-2015 at 02:41 AM.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 02:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 27AllIn
Seems like Matt bet $5000 instead of $5600 only because $5k is a nice round number.

I agree with you on that, He undoubtedly wasn't comfortable with the idea of starting over with nothing.
He'll have to adjust to Alex, even though he got it wrong he should had bet everything in final as well, He is going to be forced to adjust in the next round by taking greater risk.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 03:09 AM
He didn't get it wrong.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 03:16 AM
yes he did.
since the "he" the poster was referring to was matt.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 03:18 AM
Both Matt and Kerry answered the Man in the Iron Mask, the correct answer was the Count of Monte Cristo.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 03:37 AM
I was blown away that I actually knew that one. One of my favorite movies.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 07:05 AM
Fistpumped when he hit the daily double in double jeopardy. This guy is fun to watch.

By hit, I mean got it right.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 07:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gobbo
I was blown away that I actually knew that one. One of my favorite movies.
your not the only one who likes that movie which is why i found it strange that nobody got that question. anyways tonights episode should be pretty interesting cuz you will see alex drift from his aggressive play and the other two players going all in with their aggression.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 08:30 AM
Man in the iron mask was a great guess, it's even written by the same author. Even if someone read both books I bet they'd be hard pressed to remember which one that quote came from.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 11:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrustySam
So with the two best players of the past year facing off today, it seemed like bet sizing strategy became a big part of the competition, when contestants had an opportunity to set their own wager?

Guess today's totals get added to tomorrow's?
Yes, the totals are added together. The category for the 2nd DD was "North" and "South" America, where the word north or south had to be in the response. AJ played great and pwned Matt, but gotta say that 2nd DD was too easy for anyone under 50.

Last edited by SGspecial; 11-20-2015 at 11:47 AM. Reason: I just barely fit in that age range
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerFan2008
Get real, ur boy Matt was owned by AJ, AJ is playing optimum strat, and has way to big a lead .....game over
optimum strat 4 life GGG tid Alex!
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 02:38 PM
In the 2nd DD wouldn't betting like 12k be better? Bc 27k or 30k either way the game is basically over, but if he gets it wrong his chances of winning with 3-4K has to significantly higher then having 0
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 02:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringinabox
In the 2nd DD wouldn't betting like 12k be better? Bc 27k or 30k either way the game is basically over, but if he gets it wrong his chances of winning with 3-4K has to significantly higher then having 0
I think AJ knew he is clearly the class of that field and he could come back if he was wrong...
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 04:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerFan2008
I think AJ knew he is clearly the class of that field and he could come back if he was wrong...
just the opposite if he thought his opponents were of no threat he would have wagered less. why would he risk putting his lead in danger if his opponents were weak. think about it.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 04:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ringinabox
In the 2nd DD wouldn't betting like 12k be better? Bc 27k or 30k either way the game is basically over, but if he gets it wrong his chances of winning with 3-4K has to significantly higher then having 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by xalas
just the opposite if he thought his opponents were of no threat he would have wagered less. why would he risk putting his lead in danger if his opponents were weak. think about it.
The answer to both of these is that it's not about having a lead in jeopardy, it's about having lock games (2x lead over 2nd, so you don't get screwed in final jeopardy). If he bets 4k less, and Matt got the FJ question right, Matt would have the lead going into day 2. Even with the AJ all-in DD, if Matt bet it all on FJ and got it right, he'd only be behind by 400 going into day 2.

Last edited by captZEEbo; 11-20-2015 at 05:06 PM.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote
11-20-2015 , 05:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by captZEEbo
The answer to both of these is that it's not about having a lead in jeopardy, it's about having lock games
Not when your playing a 2 day total game. His thinking was obvious. Put himself so far ahead that he will be difficult to catch, or lose the DD and be on equal footing all over again. He probably didnt even care if he lost the DD because he had confidence in his ability to bounce back and still win the game.

Plus he obv knew the category. He would be an idiot not to bet it all in that spot and bury his opponents when hes very confident in the category.
Former poker standout Alex Jacob 6-time winner on Jeopardy Quote

      
m