Quote:
Originally Posted by ZBTHorton
I don't really see why it shouldn't be a big deal.
Every person in America has a credit rating that tells companies when to loan them money and how trustworthy they are in regards to paying back loans/whatever. We don't have that luxury as poker players, so when people are not to be trusted, they need to be outted so others don't get screwed.
Very true once again. Two points to bring up though.
1. At this point, it should just be assumed all players are capable of non payment on loans and no one should be trusted on word alone. Im not saying all poker players will prove to be untrustworthy, its just that no one should act surprised anymore and learn to move on.
2. As for Eric's situation, people knew the terms and conditions of his money and chose to engage with him either way. Not fair to **** all over him just because this time around you assume payment will not occur as fast as previous times.