Quote:
Originally Posted by ProRailbird
the thing with donkaments is most of the money is up top so if you win 1 or 2 huge donkaments chances are that is always going to make up most of your profit
So then what importance does a graph of ~8000 donkaments have when you can take out 1 sample and the player has his ROI reduced by 70%?
I am not arguing Charlie isn't a good player or anything like that but it makes absolutely no sense to show a sample size in which any particular player could have been breakeven due to luck. Just don't bring it up as "evidence" on it's own.
I'm looking at the people that post one graph and then tell others they are making an idiot out of themselves.