Harrington should get a temp ban for this on FTP, implying someone superusing in public chat is just plain f rude.. what the hell was he thinking?

I think he wasn't been douchey asking why he smooth called, BUT he's douchey for saying
harrington25: obv not but im gonna show that hand to few ppl
harrington25: urin david etc

Don't know the guy, but that harrington acts like a little gay boy.

yes it shows the backs of the cards

It looks like tilt chat, and even besides that Harrington plays mostly cap I think so there's probably not much of a skill gap in deep plo between gordo and him (gordo could be better I dunno). Either way your point doesn't really hold as Harrington has been known to say stupid things in chat when he's tilting.

Standard superuser hustle call.
He reps that he's not superusing when he actually is.

this...belongs in the best one liners thread.

It's not original, Dogishead used a similar line with his J high call.

So if you were in that position you would only raise QQ and 99?

love it

original's here


Full Tilt Poker Game #7896387621: Table Patrik (6 max) - $2000/$4000 - Limit Omaha H/L - 19:51:39 ET - 2008/09/01
Seat 2: LoLiNa ($46,996)
Seat 4: Phil Ivey ($307,613)
Seat 5: David Benyamine ($93,998)
Seat 6: Gus Hansen ($78,996)
David Benyamine posts the small blind of $1,000
Gus Hansen posts the big blind of $2,000
The button is in seat #4
*** HOLE CARDS ***
LoLiNa raises to $4,000
Phil Ivey calls $4,000
David Benyamine raises to $6,000
Gus Hansen calls $4,000
LoLiNa calls $2,000
Phil Ivey raises to $8,000
David Benyamine calls $2,000
Gus Hansen calls $2,000
LoLiNa calls $2,000
*** FLOP *** [6s Qs 2d]
David Benyamine checks
Gus Hansen checks
LoLiNa bets $2,000
Phil Ivey raises to $4,000
David Benyamine raises to $6,000
Gus Hansen has 15 seconds left to act
Gus Hansen calls $6,000
LoLiNa raises to $8,000
Phil Ivey calls $4,000
David Benyamine calls $2,000
Gus Hansen calls $2,000
*** TURN *** [6s Qs 2d] [9h]
David Benyamine bets $4,000
Gus Hansen calls $4,000
LoLiNa raises to $8,000
Phil Ivey raises to $12,000
David Benyamine calls $8,000
Gus Hansen: wauw
Gus Hansen has 15 seconds left to act
Gus Hansen calls $8,000
LoLiNa calls $4,000
*** RIVER *** [6s Qs 2d 9h] [Jd]
David Benyamine checks
Gus Hansen checks
LoLiNa checks
Phil Ivey bets $4,000
David Benyamine folds
Gus Hansen has 15 seconds left to act
Gus Hansen folds
LoLiNa has 15 seconds left to act
LoLiNa folds
Uncalled bet of $4,000 returned to Phil Ivey
Phil Ivey mucks
Phil Ivey wins the pot ($111,998)
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $112,000 | Rake $2
Board: [6s Qs 2d 9h Jd]
Seat 2: LoLiNa folded on the River
Seat 4: Phil Ivey (button) collected ($111,998), mucked
Seat 5: David Benyamine (small blind) folded on the River
Seat 6: Gus Hansen (big blind) folded on the River

LoLiNa: i had two air nut low draw nut flush draw what u guys have
Phil Ivey: i had a bet button

lol, not quite the same but still amazing. How the hell do you fold on a $112k pot for $4k on the river? I don't understand that level of nittiness that limit requires but those are some amazing odds on the money surely? I can see he said he missed but it's not the first time i've seen stuff like that.

yo phil ivey kills it with the i had a bet button

not bad potatophreek:

Go back to NVG OH **** THATS WHERE WE'RE AT!

i think that tom had 9T or Q9 just called so he could see H25's cards

So only calling the 3rd nuts is a "shady" play now?? Obviously it's Omaha...3rd nuts are ALWAYS good here....</sarcasm> I am sure a lot of people would just call down the river bet against a good-reg.

In my last 6 months learning to play Omaha I can't tell you how much money the 3rd nuts have cost me on boards like that.

And air with blockers to balance.

I use the 'just clicking buttons' phrase all the time. :/

Lol my bad. Still tilt chat.

Yeah - Did u see the pokerstatic inteview? Watch the interview and all is revealed. This chat is 100% in line w/ his character.

To only raise in that spot with QQ and 99 seems really weak to me. Since the flop was checked back and called on the turn (with two flush draws out and possible straight draws), surely you would almost never turn up with QQ or 99 there (because you would have bet the flop or raised the turn) meaning that opponent is free to bet on the river and not have to worry about a rasie.

super std river call with 3rd nuts

if he raises the river only QQ and 1010 are calling 100% of the time, and KJ/33 will call some percentage of the time. 910 is unlikely as Dwan has a 9, and everything else folds. He's only definitely getting called by a hand that beats him, and the strong hands that he's value raising against will sometimes fold. Raising river is -EV.

if harrington25 leads that flop then he stacks durrr on the river. I dunno why he's bitching he just called when his own line is the reason.

All of this is almost completely irrelevant. Opponent already bet. The only questions left are the ones I raised in my earlier post. Lots of things have to go right for a raise to be clearly correct here. I'm not in the "ZOMG EASIEST FLAT EVER" camp because I wasn't there, but flatting is certainly reasonable.

If you are claiming some sort of metagame fail by durrrr, I doubt he's concerned about his opponents being *more* willing to bet rivers.

I'm not reallly talking about that specific hand, I'm commenting on if his strategy is exploitable in that spot.

If durrrr is only raising QQ and 99 in that spot then surely its exploitable. With QQ or 99 durrrr will be betting the flop a ton and if he is bet on the turn then surely he will be rasing often. Durrrr will almost never have QQ or 99 in that spot. It definitely is concerning that your opponent can bet the river and be almost certain that you're not going to raise.

The strongest strategy is one which you can tell your opponent and yet he is still unable to figure out how to exploit it.