Quote:
Originally Posted by omarcreepin
Hi guys, just a thought regarding the challenge.
Lets say PA is losing 400k (or any somewhat significant amount for that matter) with 300 hands left to play. Won't the integrity of the game evaporate? What I mean is, wouldn't it be in durrrr's interest to park the bus and completely shut down? And conversely, would'nt PA be motivated to pump every pot in attempt come unstuck?
My point is, as the game draws to a close I dont see how it will maintain its honesty. I don't think enough thought has been put into the latter stages of the challenge and its inherent change in dynamics.
I'd love to hear some thoughts on this.
Look, the structure of the bet is the structure of the bet. The players should probably play in such a way as to maximize their EV, however they want to define it. There is no loss of "integrity" or "honesty" in this. It's just the game they've both chosen to play.
It's not a straight cash game. It's a cash game with a large side bet, which absolutely can influence the proper strategy for the 50k hands.
Does it affect the "integrity" or "honesty" of a football game when the losing team, rather than driving for a first down like the rest of the game, has to throw a hail mary with 6 seconds left to play because it's their only chance to win? The rules determine the strategy.
You could say that a tournament has no "integrity" or "honesty" because players should play cautiously on the bubble if they could be stacked out. It's just the structure of the game defining the best strategy in both cases.