Quote:
Originally Posted by mrno1324
Snakenando should be overjoyed to get publicity really. Have heard jack **** about him or what he’s been up to ever since he backstabbed upswing.
Sorry for a long post. I haven't posted for a while about JNandez or PLO coaching ITT.
I would imagine that JNandez is doing very well financially out of his training site, based on the number of YouTube subscribers he has, which is 26,700
Upswing poker have 29,700, Run It Once have only 3,500
His YouTube videos generally get ~7,000 views
His PLO course is $99 per month, so if one very conservatively says that only 1% of his YouTube subscribers pay $99 per month for the course then it's $26.5K revenue per month which is $317K per year.
And given that it appears he is frugal with costs, trying to get out of the knitting contract, lol, and some anecdotal "evidence" of letting staff (content creators) go, it seems likely that he is doing very well financially from his PLO coaching course company.
He is a good PLO coach for sure, however what I don't like about his coaching is that he is always learning stuff and working new things out and running sims on solvers etc, etc, which is partly paradoxical because he claims to be great at PLO and know all of the concepts to teach to others, but at the same time is always making new discoveries about strategies.
Some of these discoveries, that I have observed, were really basic things that IMO he should have known about years ago, for example that multi way pre flop aggression (potting and re-potting by other players), devalues our hand if we have a high card hand because we can safely assume card removal of many of the high cards in the deck as well as therefore be dominated by better high card hands than ours.
Well this is really, really obvious, but it took studying a PLO solver for him to fully realise this, according to what he said in one of his YouTube videos.
The above is reinforced by the fact that on one of his free YouTube videos he did while still under UpSwing's banner/umbrella he applied completely the wrong ranges (they were far too low) to his opponents' pre flop hands in the exact situation above, where there was a lot of raising and re-raising. I questioned this on another thread somewhere, or it may even be ITT. He would now be applying the correct ranges having recently discovered them using a solver.
So his coaching is good but I would treat it with caution and do your own study and research to confirm that what he is teaching is all correct.
Obviously, you only have to be better than the line up you are playing against to be a winning poker player, it doesn't necessarily follow that you are playing optimal, you might still be making mistakes, and I think that this is the case with some of his PLO coaching. He beats the games he plays in, but still makes some mistakes.
His coaching focuses on cash games, but when he starts talking about PLO tournaments he says some wrong things, for example his explanation he gave about why you often raise less pre (meaning a smaller raise size) than in NLHE MTTs was completely wrong, but I am not going to volunteer why it was wrong on this thread!