Quote:
Originally Posted by Lozgod
I don’t think online poker ATM is required to comply. No one involved in the case has mentioned it. Assuming this compliance starts in June (whenever the date was) I don’t see where De,NV,NJ are ordered to stop online poker amongst each other.
Seems they are making “the online Lottery” whatever that is, the focus. I know it is an educated assumption to include poker but no one in court is discussing poker.
Wasn't the subject case brought by a lottery, and there are no online poker or casino plaintiffs ?
An online lottery describes when a lottery sells tickets, instant or otherwise, online.
There would not be any order from this court related to matters not before it, although an ideal injunction might be broadly drafted so as to chill any enforcement against anything added in by the 2019 OLG memo.
Appeal is certain regardless of the court's rulings, even injunctive relief, if any, against interim enforcement.