I was thrilled when I read about this yesterday. I've never understood how "civil forfeiture" (what's civil about it?) could pass the constitutional test of "no unreasonable seizures". I'm very glad to see Holder put this into effect.

True, it won't solve all of the problems in this regard by any means, but at least it's a start in the right direction. Lots of people, from poker players to antique dealers to lots and lots of small business owners to the Amish and many more who routinely deal in cash - often thousands of dollars at a time. No crime involved, just normal business.

Why should anyone have to defend themselves, or their property, when no criminal charges are filed is beyond me.

Lee

If only 1 in 10 cops are dirty ( and that's likely too high) How many of them are there? Thousands!! This new rule is certainly better that how it was.

if stopped do not allow search
make them get a warrent
JUST SAY NO
it may be a hassle for you but if you agree to allow its your fault

FU!

The police can get a warrant.

that's dodgy in itself... shouldn't have to necessarily even involve a lawyer if you can prove that the money was quite obviously from a legit source etc..