Quote:
Originally Posted by TrustInBrass_KAOS
The article doesn't list where you can find the full judgment, so I can't figure out which provisions of the CCA the Borgata alleged were violated. Anyone have a link to the judgment?
Don't have the judgment. Sounded to me that the judge, through tortured reasoning, was saying that the state permits casinos in games where the house has the edge so that the state benefits by getting a percentage of the house win. Therefore, Ivey breached the "contract" with the casino by avoiding the casinos guaranteed edge.
Personally, I like his chances on appeal (at least on this issue) but, the casino may win on their appeal of the denial of fraud