Quote:
Originally Posted by bluefingin
What he could or could not have done is completely irrelevant. Not being able to prevent scumbags from doing something scummy is not a legitimate justification for being associated with scumbags.
Yeah, I agree with this re: Negreanu's late 2015 pushback and negotiations with David Baazov & co.
On one hand, Daniel being unsuccessful persuading then-Amaya higher ups not to rip off Supernova/SNE players is obviously a bad look (given that he told certain customers that his resignation was in play when it obviously wasn't).
But on the other hand, at least he spoke up about how awful that SN/SNE decision was, and went on Joey's podcast during a time when then-Amaya execs had clearly bailed on communicating anything meaningful to affected players.
It's too bad after all those years of videos/rants that what DNegs preached about "integrity" didn't turn out to apply to the company he works for, or to him (in regards to him not collaborating with those who engage in such practices).
But I think it's clear that the full "responsibility" of the SN/SNE removal should be placed with David Baazov & corresponding Amaya executives/stakeholders at that time who made that decision -- and not with Daniel Negreanu, others in the industry, "entitled" players, or whoever else those then-Amaya execs attempted to pin their s*** stain on via guilt by association.
Just my opinion, though.
Last edited by dhubermex; 07-25-2018 at 02:37 PM.