After reading all the DN bashing in this thread, I began watching his vlogs towards the end of the WSOP and actually enjoyed them quite a bit. Seems like he is pretty honest about his play, successes, and struggles.
I never really enjoyed his goofy table persona and he's not one of my favorite players. I've always preferred the quiet mystique of people like Ivey and Dwan over the attention whore camera addicts, but all in all DN seems like he is "good for the game", even if there are some valid criticisms about PokerStars and his attention-seeking personality.
The way I see it, he's kind of a prisoner of his own success. His status as one of the biggest names in the game means he has to continue cultivating attention to maintain his stature, which in turn means making vlogs, chatting up fans, posing for pictures, playing high rollers, and exposing his life to constant criticism. While I think any poker player would love to have a free ride from PokerStars, the work necessary to maintain that status isn't something that I envy.
Some of the criticism of DN seems valid, but a lot of it seems petty and unfair. Having achieved modest success in other realms of life, I can confirm that
crab mentality is a real phenomenon and that anyone who achieves notoriety within a given field will attract a certain number of haters regardless of whether it's warranted or not.
With DN, a lot of the criticism seems excessive and petty. I suspect that very few poker players would come off smelling like roses if they filmed themselves every day and aired their dirty laundry in public. How many people on 2p2 have had relationship problems? How many have gotten angry over a bad beat or downswing? How many are chiseled Greek gods in perfect physical shape? I saw plenty of fatties at the WSOP and there are plenty of pros in far worse shape than DN.
Yet so many people in this thread are just tripping over themselves to take shots at this guy, even though his behavior in ~15 years of poker A-list status has been mostly devoid of major scandals and shadiness. If not for the fact that at least one of the 2+2 founders seems to harbor a deep grudge against him, I wonder if this thread (which essentially amounts to the "let's all bash DN" party) would be allowed to continue, as it's little more than an endless stream of dubious personal attacks against the man.
To me, DN seems like a vain and insecure guy who thrives on attention, yet beyond that I really don't find him to be a particularly bad or sinister person, especially in the context of poker, which harbors its fair share of genuine scumbags and crooks. DN, if you happen to read this, keep doing you. You may not be a saint, but you don't deserve all this vitriol either.