Not all all they are just trolls he never says anything to those guys.

Did Daniel out his assistant as having AIDS in the latest DAT poker podcast?

In a discussion about Amanda having a flu/cold and being quarantined upstairs to avoid getting him sick, this discussion came out about to sanitize her room after she recovers. Starts at 14:36:

https://datpodcast.libsyn.com/gpi-aw...ast-episode-61

Yeah, I heard that and made that assumption as well.

That is quite an assumption to make simply from hearing he has a compromised immune system. It could be literally dozens of autoimmune or blood disorders. As well as a host of other causes. Jesus.

I'm not a doctor.

Do you associate AIDS with homosexuality and associate Negreanu with homosexuality, so made the jump to assuming some sort of linkage between Negreanu and AIDS?

Huh? What are you even talking about?

How many of those other possibilities would lead someone to say "I'll just leave it at that" And how is it acceptable to reveal any serious health condition of an employee to the world?

Literally any of them would, as you yourself just implied in your question of the acceptability of revealing employee's health conditions.

Meh, better than his "so what if the bachelorette cheated on DFS it's no big deal"

So what if he did?

It's faulty reasoning.

He's knot woke enough I guess.

Heh

Honestly aids does come to my mind when thinking about DN. Not the disease though.

hearing aids?

Dietary aids?

hair follicling aids?

could be special ed aids in school. he may have needed them for government/ social studies, etc.

Explain? Are u in the camp of people who like lying about things to stay politically correct at all times? I wish there were betting markets on everything in the world... would love to see how long the woke ppl continue championing their bs

Are you really implying homosexual men are not a disproportional % of hiv/aids victims? Aren't they greater by something like a factor of 10? Please explain how it is a false equivocation if he assumed what you think he did.

Not only might he have assumed that, he wouldn't have been wrong. We are poker players... we hopefully are making money on non bias data driven pattern recognition/exploitation of those numbers. What in the world is the problem here?

Well, this is quite the odd derail. But this is just the Negreanu containment thread, so maybe there is no such thing as a derail, so I guess I'll jump in but not be surprised if it all gets deleted at some point.

Well, if we bring this back to what started it all, perhaps the problem becomes more obvious. Well, not really a problem, but I'd say some fairly faulty reasoning:

I mean, to jump to AIDS from that comment is pretty ridiculous.

woah... that's quite bad odds for him if they only do online is it not?