Quote:
Originally Posted by diddyeinstein
Link from the first ****ing page of Google
I don't care if Johnny Hughes is lying. I just think it's ridiculous that you think he should have to prove something to you. You are just some guy on the internet with too much free time and apparently a lot of anger.
Edit to add: FWIW, I don't even particularly like Johnny's stories (sorry, but I do love the Texas pride).
Your RateMyProfessor comment made me lol
Your google must be different than mine. Certainly not on the first page.
Anyway, I didn't "ask" that J.H. prove anything to me, at first. All I did was state that I agree with Lott. J.H. told me to look him up on some magazine website. The website information posed some interesting questions, which, when I attempted to verify them, didn't pan out.
Up to that point, I was only there and looking per J.H.'s invitation. I came back here and posted that some stuff didn't add up in regards to his claim of being the Director of a specific Department at Texas Tech.
After many hours, J.H. addressed those questions and gave a very evasive answer. I didn't find the offered information helpful and not only was I not swayed towards believing him, I was swayed further towards wondering if the part about him being a college professor was "appropriated" as well.
In any event, J.H. stated in no uncertain terms, that he is content to send me on a wild goose chase because this is fun for him. Well, okay. I asked some questions; he gives answers that don't add up; and he explains that he want to give me the run around just for asking the questions in the first place.
I got it then, I get it now. I have stated that if I want to "investigate him" I would; that is not really my aim, but J.H. seems to insist on goading me into it. I just might follow up on some stuff that I have.
I don't know why I have to keep repeating this.
1. I don't really care one way or another about J.H.'s identity for the sake of the question itself. We clear on that?
2. I only invovled myself because I spoke my opinion about the theory of another poster, Lott. Lott was being ridiculed for his "absurd" ideas, but I wanted people to know that I don't think his theories are absurd, nor does he deserve the ridicule that he was subject to.
3. At that point ... J.H. jumps in and chastises me for stating my opinion and starts said wild goose chase. Since that point, I have merely been reminding people that I am only asking questions, not stating matters of fact, etc. J.H. however, claims that makes me the biggest liar on these boards.
4. No big deal. My opinion has not changed regarding the "debate" between J.H. and Lott. I think Lott is correct and should not be ridiculed by J.H., unless J.H. wants to actually address Lott's points.
By the way, J.H. is content to "deflect" the issues as if they don't exist. Lott has made many posts in the past pointing out many facts adverse to J.H.'s claims of who he is; Lott has pointed out inconsistencies in J.H.'s stories. I am not going to rehash those; I don't know if Lott will. J.H. is content to pretend those issues never came up. For me, that's fine. Because my whole statement is merely that I believe that Lott is correct. J.H. is not interested changing my opinion in that regard, and that is just fine.