Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe Capital
I personally am not hopeful that the grey market US-facing sites will ever seriously deal with bots. From a purely business perspective they have no incentive to.
A fully above-board site like Pokerstars has an incentive to maximize profits over the long run. Turning a blind eye to bots increases short term profits during a few year period, but in the long run (5-10+ years) will inevitably kill the games. Pokerstars wants to still be making money 10 years from now, so they invest in security to deal with bots.
For sites like WPN, they know that there's very little chance they'll be around 5-10 years from now, at least as a major site. Every time a high population U.S. state regulates poker, that market is gone. If a gigantic state like CA/NY did so, that would be a huge blow, and with budget issues in both of those states its a real possibility. Not to mention the ever-looming threat of a DOJ crackdown.
So even if there were a magical button they could press that would ban all bots, they would have no incentive to press it and drastically reduce their cash game traffic today, even if it would lead to healthier traffic after a few years of rebuilding.
But there isn't a magical button they could press. Successfully identifying bots/colluders involves a lot of manpower and cutting edge programming to stay one step ahead of the bots and avoid banning honest regs who just play a predictable, high volume style. That's a lot of money which WPN has no incentive to spend - per above they probably wouldn't even crack down if there were a magic button.
So honestly the only real solution to this problem is large scale regulated interstate U.S. online poker, with most of the high population states on board. Only then will above board corporations (I.E. Stars and some day Run It Once) have an economic incentive to invest in security to protect the long-term health of the games for U.S. players.
By then, WPN's owners will be chilling at a sick house in Thailand and won't give a damn.
Amazing how many ppl believe in things not based on facts or personal experiences. Funny how all these bots apparently exist yet I never see them. Im done asking ppl for proof anymore. Also traffic is higher now than it ever has been before.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stealy Man
The sick part is some of the bot owners are doing so well that THEY are already chilling in houses in Thailand.
That's a problem... need's to be addressed.
Hahaha you guys just say anything
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Huntington
Well that's only 3 bots and they are crushing. I expected like 1-3 bb, their winrates are insane if they are bots. I always heard bots weren't that good so this is alarming. Hopefully the amount of bots are a bit exaggerated but you never know when their are rumors flying around. I'd like to see more people bringing up stats of suspected bots as there are plenty of people on the site playing a million hands/half a million hands a year on WPN so should be easy if there are that many of them.
Ahhh seems to be plenty of speculation out there they just forget to provide that proof part
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe Capital
WPN offers what amounts to something like 40-50% rakeback or more if I recall correctly for high volume players in their VIP program. In addition, there is a weekly rake race which awards something like $500-$2000/week to the highest volume players. So, the rakeback/rake race is where the real money is at and as such I imagine the goal of most bots is to break even in bb/100. Any advanced bot shenanigans that can actually pull off a positive bb/100 winrate is just gravy.
The rakeback % and $ amounts above are just rough memory from when I used to play on the site. May not be exact, but its in the neighborhood - point is you can make boatloads of money through rakeback on WPN. In fact this is what attracts a large number of honest regs to the site who are high volume rakeback grinders with low/breakeven winrates. Its like back in the day where you had tons of players grinding out Supernova Elite on Stars, making little/no money or even losing a small amount of money at the tables but collecting the $100k+ rakeback each year which they lived on.
Edit to add - to put a $ amount to answer your question, we're easily talking thousands, perhaps even five figures for the most ambitious botters in rakeback/rake race per month for these bots.
More horse****...
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowe Capital
And this is why WPN is so much more bot infested than Ignition. Both sites have laughable security, and Ignition even has the added benefit for bots of anonymous tables so that human players can't track them over time and attempt to out them. However, Ignition's effectively zero rakeback and table cap (2 table zoom / 4 ring) means that today's typical breakeven-ish entry to mid level bots can't make reasonable money on the site. You'd have to be on the cutting edge of bespoke bot design to make enough money to be worth your time on Ignition. I'm sure there are some profitable bots on Ignition, but its likely not a ridiculous percentage of the player base as on WPN.
You know how long it takes to get elite status kid?? Especially on WPN where there is a lot of low traffic times. Terrible place to even try using a bot. Is making random **** up fun?
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by HurtLocker
LOL. Yeah, like public shaming will turn dark online poker around. Another site will easily take its place for a time until it does the same thing again to its players whether that is rampant botting, cheating or embezzling straight up of players' funds. What? You thought ILLEGAL, OFFSHORE sites that don't abide under US law have your best interests at heart? After all this time?
Give me a break. Any US players playing on any these sites by NOW should expect any and all risk when investing their time and money on them.
Your stupidity is mind boggling. I wish there was bots would be easier then those regs.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Trooper
Acr does t give 2 ****s as I have said for a long time.
I emailed them a long time ago and said I would openly collide and use multiple names to cheat and told them my own accounts. They didn’t care lol.
Hands down one of the shadiest online sites offered besides BOL.
Scumbags
Bet you anything you want you cant provide that email as proof... emails save forever too so im waiting too see what kinda excuse you come up with of why you dont have it
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Last edited by Mike Haven; 02-06-2018 at 05:39 AM.
Reason: 7 consecutive posts merged