Quote:
No, not from our perspective.
It is the perception of our reality that governs the perspective towards our life
You are having it both ways here and that is what I challenge as bs,flawed thinking whatever you wanna call it.
When you answer
Was it not made to help address serious concerns?
Yes. What makes you think it wasn't?
and
Quote:
Passive aggression requires some aggression
you can't have it both ways here.
If you are addressing serious concerns of members by contacting WPN to create a dialog and they do not respond back thus resulting in removal of an advertising agreement directly as a result that IMO qualifies as aggression.
How could it not?
If the original goal was to address concerns via discussion and the simple act of a discussion did not occur then the original goal of addressing members concerns was never achieved.
So you pulled advertising and never addressed concerns through discussion
Yeah I would say it is time to stop coddling and tiptoeing around with open ended statements that allow for a future business relationship and be actively seeking answers to those concerns as this brand advertised and promoted and allowed a platform for an illegal site for US players who they actively market towards to be cheated from unfair gameplay and breach of TOS for YEARS!
I would be pisssed and would be highly aggressive in protecting the BRAND that WPN may have damaged although ultimately 2+2 should take responsibility for engaging with WPN to begin with.
I don't have to remain neutral I am a consumer of a product. A product that actually cheated me and I have no recourse. I accept this as buyer beware is a responsibility I accept as I actually knew the risk so I am not playing the poor victim just a victim
Now some ill informed people may have consumed WPN's product as a direct result from your advertising and may have been cheated as a result of that.
My point accept responsibility for what is reality.
No I use the word "nitty" in proper context.
2+2 is skeered taking the maybe we are beat in the form of wanting to protect its members and address concerns, but what if wpn isn't doing anything so lets not go all in just in case they have the nuts
Both ways you miss value cuz you want min cash on the bubble.