Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulyJames200x
Well let say all of the ppl that are staked does good. Everyone makes money. Then Cate doesn't do good and owes money. Well if she has to pay it back and every single person who gets staked has to pay it back... then it sounds like close to risk free if you ask me ... thats only if that person has to pay it back.
So how is that fair to ppl who get staked? Obviously they get money to play with... but if they have to pay it back regardless of the situation... then you can't lose money as the staker. I mean if thats the case, anyone with money should be the staker right... i mean its like being a bank and loaning money and know you will have to get it back. If you stake ppl and never get screwed by someone, that would mean its impossible to lose money except in cases where the horse does so bad... the staker has to cut the stake and cut them off so now all the money lost is not recovered then?
Yeah dude if poker was easy and everyone made money, no ever quit, no one stole money then it would be like easy money right ? Lol
But then if was so easy and didn’t have any risk (ppl give up or steal, or just keep losing in hopes of getting dropped etc) then why would anyone even look for a stake in the first place ?
But clearly u come off as someone who knows nothing about staking , very little about poker and even less about poker players
And of course they need to make it back lolololol u expect the backer to cover all the Loses and just split only profit, how stupid are you? Think about that for a minute Before u respond and make yourself look worse
Comparing to a bank lol don’t forget banks at least get interest , when staking he doesn’t get any interest and doesn’t even know if he will get it back
Last edited by golfbum983; 06-18-2019 at 07:14 PM.