Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEngineer
Of course, that's a difficult thing to have happen for many reasons. For one, DoJ hasn't indicted UB/AP for fraud. For another, not much was seized directly from them.
It's 1 thing to say "not much was seized from them" well how come that figure has never been officially released? & I take it your the head of the PPA yet even u cannot give that figure. Saying they "didnt seize that much" has as much value as saying they seized ten billion dollars NEITHER CAN BE VERIFIED BY AMYONE EXCEPT THE OWNERS & THE DOJ & for some reason neither side will. When this all went down I had a little birdy tell me they had 80 million seized the majority of which was through their European payment processor. Just a guess but I think their deal in the end was well keep the money & u won't get charged with anything
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEngineer
Yes, a fair trade treaty shows the US should have either an open online gaming market or none at all. However, the WTO won't enforce this on the US in a way that would force the US to comply, and no US court will force this on anyone.
Basically they were to scared to take on the biggest kid in the schoolyard
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEngineer
DoJ didn't swoop in and take money directly from sites, though. Money was seized from payment processors, per DoJ's interpretation of UIGEA. Sites knew this and, IMO, were required to maintain player account balances safely. If Cereus had, they'd have paid out right after Black Friday just like PokerStars did.
Pokerstars had the exact same set up but were insanely cashed up & smarter about it, they also had their entire funds seized from their payment processors 500 million. BUT on top of that they had ANOTHER 500 million sitting in a seperate players account. So they were doing it exactly the same as UB & Tilt. & lets not forget the owner of Stars was forced to step down as part of the 'DOJ deal' for his part in committing 'fraud' just like Tilt & UB were
[QUOTE=The Ponzi scheme allegations against FTP were based on that site running day-to-day operations on player balances, perhaps hoping to bridge a cach gap, but it was a very dangerous strategy for the players.
This really is on UB/AP. Players didn't paid back because they didn't have the money for repayment.[/QUOTE]
The Ponzi scheme allegations were all part of damaging the online poker site brands that were breaking the UIEGA. There was no Ponzi, it's confirmed Tilt had 95%+ of players money on hand just not in a neatly bundled 'players account'
Quote:
Originally Posted by stlboy05
Why is this not a ponzi scheme but FTP was? Neither had funds to pay players.
This is the type of BS thinking that drives me crazy FTP had all their/our money seized THATS WHY THEY 'didnt have the ***** funds'
It's simple u run a business your employee wages are $100,000 a week & your business makes $110,000 a week. Now $100,000 of that gets put into your payment processor & u put the $10k profit under your bed or spend it on Coc & hookers. Then 1 week big ol' Uncle Sam comes along & seizes that $100,000 from the bank. Because they told u it was 'fraud' to use a payment processor. Now u tell me how are u suppose to pay those wages?????
Pokerstars had kept alot of their profit which allowed them to have double what they needed on hand, credit to them & that's why they become & still are the biggest & most successful site. Smart business & low costs. FTP had all the owners & pro's etc to pay out who wanted their money each week, short sited but never the less not the reason they didnt have the money to pay the wages. (they had it but it was stolen/seized)