Quote:
Originally Posted by offmycheddars
All I have to say is you are mistaken and don't understand sarcasm well. To tired to explain. Now, everyone take a deep breath and realize no one is trying to screw anyone here. They are trying to make the company more attractive to an investor, who could pay everyone, which would make the sight relevant and probably somewhat succesful again. Like I said, relax, we should all be on the same team here.
To be honest wouldn't that investor be screwed if he bought the company thinking it had a loyal customer base dedicated to it's survival when infact all it have is a bunch of grinders trying to get their monies back?
You can try to spin this as much as you want but someone will get screwed.
Can you honestly tell me that you believe AP/UB to be viable companies?
That they can adjust and succeed in a non-us online poker market?
In a perfect world anyone who is implicit in the AP/UB scheme should be stripped of their assets and that money should should be distributed to everyone with money stuck on UB/AP and who lost money during the super user scandal.
But until that i find it appauling that the ones who ended up beeing screwed is now desperately trying to find another sucker to end up with the losses.
The screwed becomes the fu*'ers