Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerEthics
It seems like a reoccurring theme on this site (and the internet) is to have someone be accused of something and instead of ever defending themselves they and their supporters turn it into ad hominem attacks on the accuser.
Idk what happened but it would be nice if the people defending would explain and address the issues instead of just attacking and gaslighting the accusers.
I agree with you about the ad hominem attacks in response to the accuser, but there's plenty to criticize about the initial accusation as well. Maybe the accuser should consider not going on a podcast to make very serious allegations when he's completely baked out of his mind, can't even set out a understandable timeline for the community he's addressing, and isn't either able or willing to provide a shred of concrete evidence on said podcast. Maybe this is especially the case when your mugshot is out there, along with an article which describes you having been arrested for robbery with a firearm and aggravated battery with a deadly weapon. Having a history of openly publishising that you're a psychopath with homocidal fantasies isn't exactly the equivalent of holding the nuts when you're outing others for dubious behavior either.
I'm all for listening to accusations, wild as they may be, but if you're not even gonna take yourself seriously then you can't expect others to take you serious either.