Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post.

06-28-2015 , 05:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jungmit
Ok so if u did it what account would u play on?? If u were got u would play on an account of the best players? If u were bad u would choose a fishes account? U stated u would do it which is obv illegal, so u break one rule which account u gonna pick? One that give u more edge or less?!

I would create a new account. One with no history either way.
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 05:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by partywme
It's not the kinda thing which happens all the time (accounts being sold) so it's not like he's being given a really wide range of different accounts to choose from. He needs to find someone who a) he trusts 100% and b) is willing to give up their account.
I would add to the above that the account would have to be verified with copies of ID and also cleared for use in high stakes games.

You can't just start up a Pokerstars account and jump into high stakes.
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 05:44 PM
In b4 we find out some people at stars knew all along but turned a blind eye to keep a high profile nosebleed player happy.

As stupid as it sounds I wouldn't be the least bit surprised.
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 05:47 PM
Yeah remember Eli elezra admitting to having played on numerous new accounts back in the day on FTP... But then again who didn't
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 05:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gostatego
Because common sense dictates Brian used another account because of his status in the poker world. With his new gf being very active on social media and him being one of the more well known poker players he thought that playing from the USA was too big of a risk that his account would get shut down.

Add that with the fact he told a lot of the players he was playing against that it was him.

It makes way more sense that he did it to protect from getting banned than trying to gain an unfair advantage.

Now I think that Brian underestimated how much of an advantage he was gaining and how much his opponents thought he was gaining.


Bottom line is if he was doing it With the objective to steal equity he would have done it as annonomously as possible and that is clearly not what he did.
Actually, this is directly contradicted by several players saying he clearly purposely made fishy plays early during sessions to make it more believable that he was indeed the huge fish the account initially belonged to.

And that's what I really have a problem with, because it shows that there was a clear intent to deceive and that he was absolutely aware of the advantages he was deriving from MA'ing.

And honestly, even without that anecdotal evidence, to think that someone of the intelligence of Stinger (IQ/reasoning skills wise) would not realize the strategic implications of doing something like this is beyond delusional.

All this being said, I don't think it's a coincidence that Brian turns out to be the catalyst for the opening of the Pandora's Box Chuck mentioned in his excellent and depressing post.
Brian is pretty much the archetype of the guy people love to go after (I'm not excusing his behavior and his defense has definitely been terrible).

I think people are disagreeing on this issue because (as usual) they are debating from two different perspectives (grossly speaking):

One is the absolute ethical point of view of MA'ing, VPN'ing, etc...

The other is the relative gravity of BH's offence compared to what's really going on in HS games.

Clearly, from several HS players' reaction itt (Jungleman's comes to mind especially), this is indeed the very tip of the iceberg, and I think Brian, knowing this very well, feels that it's unfair he's getting so much flack for a minor offence relative to the reality of the HS landscape, whereas most of NVG, oblivious to that reality, considers his offence terrible and inacceptable.

Last edited by Land Of The Free?; 06-28-2015 at 05:57 PM.
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 05:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cabbage66
Is it easy for a site to know is soneone is using a vpn? What about if a poker site was looking into a specific account, but the account holder had a top rated vpn.I've always wondered about this.
quit using your vpn bro before you get caught
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 05:56 PM
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 05:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fivetypes
In b4 we find out some people at stars knew all along but turned a blind eye to keep a high profile nosebleed player happy.

As stupid as it sounds I wouldn't be the least bit surprised.
Ive been thinking this too
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:00 PM
This makes interesting, fascinating but depressing reading!
If indeed a HS player such as BH is found to be cheating it just makes bring the game and particularly online poker into disrepute!
As another poster mentioned, might not be a bad idea for Stars to get rid of these high stakes games and only offer up to 10/20 or so...

Have this weeks pokercast ready to go on the ipod for my communte to work tomorrow. Be interesting to hear what Lee has to say about it.
Anything less than Stars full attention to this matter, along with necessary punishment if required will turn this situation into an even bigger mess/joke and send the worng message to all those who try to gaon an advantage by breaking rules and cheating!
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:00 PM
After all that Chuckbass said, how can anyone be 100% sure that Mercier didn't go to Stars about this? By the sounds of it Stars would request hard proof regardless of however much JM says "I can guarantee it's BH, etc. etc."

If this is the case, wth is JM meant to do now other than avoid this. If he went to Stars he cant admit it as it massively shows Stars up, as well as potentially ruining many of his friendships and rep in the inner HS ring, looking like a snitch. If he goes the other way and denies he went to Stars then everyone hates him, it's lose lose.


Just feels there are far too many gaps to start jumping on the boot Mercier from team Stars bandwagon.
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fivetypes
ivey GOAT
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by walkingzed
someone should start a petition thread to remove JM as a Stars Pro. at least force him to come out and deny or admit that he was aware that BH was cheating and choose not to do anything about it because #pals #greyarea
That quote of his about NH making the final table isn't a slam dunk though. He could have been voicing a suspicion, throwing mud to see if anything sticks.

He definitely has a case to answer though.
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:13 PM
If Stars software cant detect remote desktop this is too easy and much safer than VPN
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:14 PM
Pratyush is an ****ing scumbag as well. He knows BH is MAing and cheating while masquerading as Noel Hayes and is complicit in allowing BH to cheat Ivey. Then Pratyush has the audacity to claim he was cheated in the 10K WSOP heads up tourney. All of these young punks are colluding on-line to cheat non-colluders. This is what gives on-line poker a major problem in being allowed into the US. This is fodder for the Adelstein group when lobbying the federal government. The entire poker community should come out against all of these punks. They have all outed themselves yet think it is funny how they have screwed people over. If they MA it is highly probable that they communicate with each other while at the same HS table while using a VPN.

Last edited by SGT RJ; 06-28-2015 at 10:26 PM.
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fivetypes
im sure hastings just crippled buddiga,im not 100% tho
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fivetypes
Good point. Do tax paying countries have to show evidence of the games poker winnings are made in or what?

Can he just xfer 200k from NH to Stinger and say to the IRS, oh yeh I won 200k?

Also that Joesm post is pretty interesting. If they need to identify players by law isnt he breaking the law by hiding his identity, or using a false one?

Where are you stars? Your rake payers want answers
I'm not sure if the player who is using the VPN is breaking any law, though they are certainly violating the rules of the site. They are, however, through their actions, forcing Pokerstars to be in violation of the law by accepting action from a player in the US.

Of course if they are not reporting their income, then they are in violation of tax laws.
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzxy9
I'm not sure if the player who is using the VPN is breaking any law, though they are certainly violating the rules of the site. They are, however, through their actions, forcing Pokerstars to be in violation of the law by accepting action from a player in the US.

Of course if they are not reporting their income, then they are in violation of tax laws.
Yup I agree. Its the fact he played under a second identity. That post by Joesm says stars are required by law to identify their players.

It's the MA'ing that I was wondering about.
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by partywme
Yeah remember Eli elezra admitting to having played on numerous new accounts back in the day on FTP... But then again who didn't
The look on Lederer's face is hilarious...

Eli Elezra - 17 Accounts Video [tinypic.com]
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cabbage66
Is it easy for a site to know is someone is using a vpn? What about if a poker site was looking into a specific account, but the account holder had a top rated vpn.I've always wondered about this.
. TIA
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PTLou
I've never met Brian. In the media he's always come across as likeable and one of the better souls in poker.
have you ever heard him try to explain the viktor blom game? he comes across pretty bad.
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sba9630
The look on Lederer's face is hilarious...

Eli Elezra - 17 Accounts Video [tinypic.com]
LMFAO
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sba9630
The look on Lederer's face is hilarious...

Eli Elezra - 17 Accounts Video [tinypic.com]
Back then no one thought it was a big deal to multi account. Ub would actually let u set up mutiple accounts.
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzxy9
I'm not sure if the player who is using the VPN is breaking any law, .
They are breaking UK laws if they have multiple accounts (he did) and if they played someone in the UK.

You could also ague that he intended to deceived pokerstars and the players for his personal financial gain and that is fraud. People seem to be missing this but the laws against fraud can be applied very broadly. In the gambling world we think of deceiving for profit is normal and ok. Outside of this world deceiving someone for profit is often criminal fraud.
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 06:49 PM
Hastings beaks about how bad it is for the game that this story is gaining ground, while what he did could possibly be the worst thing for the game. It's pos like this who give poker a black eye, not media outlets or ppl who help bring it to light and expose it.

What he did only hurts chances of further regulation of online poker yet he talks about hoping to see legislation in the future, playing in the comfort of his own home etc. It's sad how delusional this dude is.

Multi-Accts on PS making plenty of ill gotten money, then goes on to have an amazing summer winning 2 bracelets already this series, sighhh.

Where's the god damn justice?
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote
06-28-2015 , 07:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingofcool
Jungleman and his hitman usually don't care about losing money to cheats and thieves.
hitman loves thieves $$$
Brian "Stinger88" Hastings Multi-Accounting as "NoelHayes" Cliffs in first post. Quote

      
m