Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigoldnit
I don't see it as a witch hunt.
I'm not referring to Hastings when I call it a witch hunt, I'm referencing all the sanctimonious people, clamoring about selbst for sharing a dissenting opinion and mercier for simply knowing this was happening. All the people ranting about anyone remotely related to the account should be banned, and all the other nonsense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigoldnit
What I see is:
(a) a large group of players ranging from casual to serious players who think what Stinger did was bad, are legitimately surprised to hear that his behavior could be just the tip of the iceberg, and are trying to figure out just how big and dirty that iceberg is and;
(b) a clique of hs players who just want to come in and say, "lol, newbs, cheating iz super standard."
Group B may be correct, but it doesn't make them right, imo.
You're view of B is just incorrect. First it's not a clique, it's just anyone who plays reasonable stakes online. Those of us who were playing for a living when Black Friday happened, had a lot of tough decisions, and the country/site saying you just lost your job because of some random rule change, is bull****. I think VPNing is completely fine, I see nothing wrong with it. Multi accounting, is bad, but you can't live in the US while you're playing on your own account, or it'll be rather easy to catch you, then you lose access to the largest poker site in the world.
So the multi accounting is bad, but I can understand why he did it. Now this view, is one that most players who played in the US during Black Friday likely share. This is the viewpoint of group B, not "Cheating is standard", but "You have a lot of tough decisions as a US online poker player, especially when no US site runs your games."
Now group A, their viewpoint is ridiculous. That's how they should think about the botting fiasco, not this. Does VPNing or Multiaccounting give anyone an inherent advantage in poker over anyone else, outside of the high stakes? No. It's not a big deal.