Quote:
Originally Posted by UwantMyGame
Important observations and questions from both posts.
What amount of responsibility does Poker Stars bear for the state of the game?
If Poker Stars security is comprehensive why so frequently does it take players investing numerous hours documenting abuse before Poker Stars takes action?
If Poker Stars cannot provide safe games should they be considered for inclusion in the U.S market?
What is the most appropriate or effective way to obtain answers on this issue?
Is there a regulatory institution that Poker Stars complies with which can provide answers if petitioned?
Poker Stars remains firm in not disclosing any internal information. Under most circumstances this is to be respected. Due to the recent varied problems regarding security it may be time for Poker Stars to offer evidence of actions improving security and outlining any new procedures.
It might help if you can itemize just what are the "recent varied problems regarding security" you want new procedures to address. Problems with account security, player transfers, bots et cetera present very different issues than collusion in game play, back-door access to hole cards, et cetera.
For example, if US regulators require GPS for geo-location issues, such as in Nevada and New Jersey, it is certain those will be implemented by any new licensee. Same for other regulatory measures that might be the rule under various licensing schemes. Stars is licensed all around the world, under a variety of different sets of rules, no reason to think it would not comply with the various US markets' operating and licensing rules.
FWIW, Amaya already IS licensed in New Jersey as a provider for gambling software I believe. Would you feel better if the Full Tilt brand and products were offered in the US, instead of PokerSars ?
In any event, your seeming opposition to any new competition in the US poker markets is puzzling.
"A quick list of the companies Amaya does business with in some form or another (primarily as a supplier of casino platforms, poker platforms and casino content):
•Caesars.
•Golden Nugget.
•Borgata.
•Trump Plaza."
http://www.onlinepokerreport.com/134...ersey-answers/
If you feel that Stars has broken some regulation in some licensing jurisdiction outside the US, the regulator to complain to (or petition as you put it) is where your account is located .... look it up. I understand that is not very dramatic, but it is the answer to your question.
(If your beef concerns solely MAing, would the "security problem" be solved if MAing were permitted; same for anonymous tables, changing screen names, and other non-game play matters.)
A good poker environment satisfies player demand best, which means perhaps most often the entertainment demands of recreational players, rather than creating the optimal abattoir for bumhunters' specific benefit.
Last edited by Geezer Soze; 08-18-2015 at 11:22 AM.