I came up across this article before and now I re-read it. There is no answer on what I'm looking for. More than that this final statement from the article support my previous thoughts that GTO cannot give you a big advantage
Quote:
Near-optimal GTO play is just the first step. Once your baseline strategy can’t be easily exploited, you can spend the rest of your time studying opponents’ tendencies and adjusting to their weaknesses. There will be plenty of opponents who don’t think about ranges, who don’t adjust to some of the game information, or who are just playing their own way. Adjusting to them is what GTO, and poker, is really all about.
I would give this simple explanation to my thoughts:
If I play the worst possible, but mathematically correct way (without intentionally dumping chips), like pushing ai every single hand, then my opponent, playing GTO, will get hundreds BB/100 depending on how deep stack we play. If I'll push 50% of my hands then my opponent, playing GNO, will have significantly less then 50% of initial advantage. And so on. And when I'll be somehow close to GTO, playing perfect GTO will give to my opponent just a miserable advantage.
Come back to our case I assumed that the four humans played against Libratus are good enough so the bot would have some advantage, but not significant.
But I was impressed with 14-28BB/100