Quote:
Originally Posted by restorativejustice
Comments during this challenge by the Professor and how he and the University interpreted AI's defeat last year as a "statistical tie" caused me to develop a very healthy skepticism about public science and experts and how both can be just as biased and corrupted by monetary/reputational rewards as the rest of us. Perhaps that will be the real benefit of the this contest.
p.s.-- If the AI wins even one dollar more than the humans in this contest there will NOT be a rematch with "better" human player for reasons noted above.
Hi, I created Claudico (not Libratus). I wanted to say first that I am very impressed with what the team has done for Libratus. I agree that if they win, it is unlikely that they will do another challenge (why risk a "loss" after they have already "won"?)
I would like to run another challenge with my team against doug, sauce, ike, and jungleman in approximately one year after this, assuming we can work out a payment scheme both sides agree to and I can find a way to raise the money. My bot would not tank nearly as long as Libratus and would likely not use a supercomputer. I'd like to do this at Seminole HR, and I think it could be ready one year from now.