Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilbury Twist
Okay, I see what you're getting at... it would be very much a methodical, three-steps-forward-two-steps-back process, but eventually you'd unload all of your fakes. Plus, you could easily get rid of a bunch in one fell swoop at the end of the day by picking a good spot to dump -- a bluff that you know won't work, or an attempted "hero call" in a spot where you are sure you're beat.
A bit of a tell-tale sight would be watching this guy stack his chips after winning a sizable pot. While most people grab up like denominations in little chunks, he would be meticulously sorting his newly won gray chips out like forks and knives into a utensil drawer. These go here, these go there... But most people wouldn't be looking for that unless they suspected something from the get-go.
OK, we have to throw a yellow flag on this logic.
If he is so successful at dumping the fake chips, then there is no way he can accumulate. They can get spread around the table, but if they are a substantial fraction of the table, he's still going to end up a signficant number in his stack.
Those he sends into the pots he wins, he gets back. If he accumulates chips (which he'd have to do to survive into the money), then he's going to still have fakes.
While the chips added were a small fraction of the total in the tournament, they had to be a large fraction of the total on his table(s).
Whats he supposed to do?
Dump all his fakes and then fold in any pot where there are put back in? And win enough to stay alive?
Last edited by danspartan; 01-25-2014 at 08:57 AM.