Quote:
Originally Posted by DAS19
Don't you think it would help to start to select the chip set randomly for each event. It would make it a little more difficult to counterfeit if you didn't know which set was going to be used for that particular event. Seems pretty obvious but I guess it wasn't. He probably could of just waited for the the event that used that set and bought in late but the first event usually has one of the biggest guarantees of the series.
you could come up with a variety of slightly better procedures to help with security leaks, but wont change the fundamental issue.
Using NJ regs as an example, as I scanned those a few days ago. most other state regs probably similar.
two types of chips in current NJ regs
"Gaming Chips" pretty tightly controlled supply chain with licensed, regulated suppliers selling only to licensed casinos, and very hard to counterfeit.
"non gaming chips" uncontrolled, unlicensed supply chain and avail to all with a credit card who want to buy, and easy to counterfeit, if they cant find exactly what they want.
There needs to be a third category that has cost savings of "non-gaming" but some of the security of "gaming", then better procedures to deter chip smuggling between tournaments. Your randomize sets used idea, is as at least one idea for improvement, keep it up,
when the regs were originally written, regulators did not envision a market developing where 1000's of players would be playing for millions of dollars in a MTT.
other thread would be great place to share views on the above