Quote:
Originally Posted by TomCollins
Gold has non monetary value. Bitcoin does not (perhaps it does if you consider nerd status points).
Gold does, but it actually doesn't need to have those non-monetary uses. The
primary value of it comes from its ability to be used as money. There are certain properties that make something able to be used as money. These include scarcity, recognizability, portability, divisibility, ability to be stored over time, and difficulty of counterfeiting.
Gold has these properties. And of course, some other metals, like Silver, do also. But anything that has those properties will have value because it can be used to fulfill the role of being money, which is something all modern civilized societies need. Bitcoin has these properties, so it does have value and, assuming the system itself isn't hacked or compromised (which looks unlikely), Bitcoin always will have value.
Quote:
And no, Bitcoin is not scarce. At least not in the cryptocurrency sense. There are an unlimited number of potential cryptocurrencies that could exist at little to no cost. Not being scarce is one of the biggest problems with a currency.
There can be other cryptocurrencies, but if those other currencies aren't scarce, then they won't have value. If those other cryptocurrencies ARE ALSO scarce like Bitcoin (and have the other properties as well), then those other cryptocurrencies will have value. But that does not effect Bitcoin, because Bitcoins themselves ARE scarce, and have value independent of the existence of these other coins.