Quote:
Originally Posted by ProffesionalMalaka
Actually, it does say a lot. He had to use just to stay on the same level as everyone else, and the only reason he eventually quit. You made it sound like I said he did it voluntarily to get an edge. No, they all did it because if you don’t you’re drawing dead.
perhaps he wasnt talented enough..
i am very likely not talented enough to beat high stakes, should i cheat? Should i make the assumption that, because i have to cheat to beat HS, linus and other crushers are cheating? No, they are more talented (and work harder). And when one of these huge talents get caught cheating we as a poker community should not look the other way.. like the Cyclists union didnt look away when armstrong got caught
Quote:
Originally Posted by TouchOfEVil
Just watch ikarus slugant. Documentary about a cyclist that juices on purpose to see if he can avoid steroidtests to figure out how lance avoided tearing positive on 500+ tests. Spoiler: he did it easily.
Now proceed to claim the tour is juicefree lol, this is on the same level as claiming bodybuilders on the stage are natty. The most tested athlete in history never got caught, he admitted on his own behalf but you still think it’s natty? Ok. Got tons of bridges for sale!
Edit: ok I got trolled, wp
ive watched it, very interesting
i also said: there are definitely clean cyclists in the tour, of course not all of them
never claimed the tour is juice free, thats an utopia like saying all of high stakes is cheat-free. But i say in both cases: condemn any wrongdoing before we just accept is as being there. We dont want the best cheater to win but the most talented or hardest working player to win, right? at least, i do
never claimed there is no cheating/doping going on, i just expressed that by allowing or tolerating it you get on a very slippy slope.. whats allowed as generally cheating but not a big deal next?
But i will say that there hasnt been a single bodybuilder ever who even thought about steroids, that should be very obvious :S