Quote:
Originally Posted by SamuraiJon
because the way they are handling this is ridiculous.
It may be pointless and or worthless to point out again that from what I can see the DOJ is, at least so far, handling this case just like they do every other remissions case. I know this is not the answer everybody is looking for, but it is seemingly the reality of the matter, at least for the time being. I know the speculation has been endless about how the "differences" in this case will make it faster, easier, etc. Maybe they ultimately will. But for now, the DOJ has acted on this case just as they have all other cases I can find to look at.
Right now, I just don't think they have anything to add to what we already know and that is they are seeking a claims processor. That is the next step in the process. In all the remissions cases that I can find any "pre-remissions" info on I have yet to see a single "update" (aside from the initial press releases announcing the settlement or forfeiture or both) from the DOJ relating to any status or progress UNTIL the DOJ and/or the processor send out the first remission letters to potential petitioners. Now, from what I can see from other cases that could happen in a month or two, or (God help us) a year or two. That is just how wide the range of activity has been in other cases. I suspect (actually I hope, more than I suspect) this case will be closer to the 4-6 month range. But, this is
complete speculation on my part based solely on the info available to me from other remissions cases I have read. Somebody else here could read the exact same cases and come to a completely different conclusion. So, I recommend people here read them for yourself and decide for yourself what to think about the situation.
The DOJ obviously do not feel the same sense of urgency the FTP victims (or any other fraud victim from any other case) do. But, to suggest that there is something we can do to speed up the process seems unfruitful. I doubt the PPA can have much, if any, effect on the process and that is in no way meant to cast any aspersions on the PPA or their efforts on behalf of US Poker Players. I applaud them for all they do. They are our voice on Capital Hill, and we need them and they need our support.
My comment has everything to do with the DOJ and their process for handling remissions and the history they have consistently displayed during the process. As far as the ability to put pressure on the DOJ please consider some of the very high profile cases the DOJ has handled have included as victims the largest banks in the country, huge foreign banks, the largest hedge funds in the US, major political figures, major Hollywood players and some of the richest and most influential people in the US. They all had to wait for the process. Some are still waiting. As are we......sigh