Quote:
Originally Posted by OrginalUserNameNot
But hasn't it already been proven that the other hookers can't provide better BJs? iPoker, merge etc all have inferior software. Granted if they were to invest in software devlopment that could change, which makes one wonder why they havent done so already? Cheap bastages?
Let's revisit the variables...there is an improved BJ...OR...a lower price for a comparable BJ.
iPoker, merge, etc doesn't have to provide a better software...they simply have to create the proper utility in switching sites to compete...which would mean lower rakes AND/OR improved software.
If they improve one or both enough, they gain customers. If they can't provide better software, then they must provide lower rake costs (or better bonuses, or both). If they can't provide better bonuses and lower rake, then they must increase quality of the software.
Of course, this assumes the market is fully saturated...because if not, they can also advertize to virgin consumers (virgin, as in not already in the market as consumers).
BTW...by conceding you have other choices, you have conceded there is no monopoly problem. You're simply complaining about the best option not being good enough...which is completely subjective. It's like complaining you aren't paid fairly when it's clear you can't find a better job. Sure, you might want $100 an hour instead of $10 an hour, but if you can't find even an $11 an hour job as an alternative, you're just whining irrationally.