Nate Silver was a guest on the latest Long Form podcast. I thought I would share it, because he touches up on his online poker career for 5-10 minutes.
I listened to it. He first mentions online poker at the 6-minute mark, then the interviewer brings it back up at the 8-minute mark and the discussion begins.
Covers some of the same ground as the old podcast re poker (poker is only 5-10 minutes, mostly other stuff.. growing up, work in politics/polling analysis)
Interesting: notes that he made 6 figures playing online two years in a row followed by a -70k year.
Some of the confusion may be due to all the percentage quoting that was being relayed by major outlets on Election Night, which was later turned into viral videos once the results had come in. In some of those, I think there are incorrect statements citing Nate Silver or the New York Times as having come up with the "98%" number, but it was actually the Huffington Post afaik.
I read fivethirtyeight election coverage pretty religiously.
In my opinion, Nate Silver essentially *nailed it* in 2016. Yes - he had Hillary as about 2:1 favorite, but that gave Trump a much better shot than other oddsmakers.
People who over-relied on the polls (which all indicated she would win), put Hillary's chances in the 80-95% range. Silver and his team sensed some reasons that polling in 2016 may be missing the mark (especially with such a non-traditional candidate in Trump).
The polling was actually pretty accurate. She was supposed to win by 2-3%, which she did. The pollsters just missed how how much the electoral college can distort things.