So I'm the guy that Scotty Clark called a during the recent filming of the Best Damn Poker Show. In case you missed his post you can find it here
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/29...r-show-300065/
I felt obliged to make this post because a few things are really getting lost in the noise surrounding Scotty's thread.
First, regarding Scotty: I got nothing against the guy and liked the short time we played together. We were having fun at the table and I'm sure most if not all of the players got bleeped at some point during the filming. That said, Scotty and myself were probably the most raucous. It was in good fun. And I was about to tell Scotty he reminded me of my brother when he called me a . BTW that sealed it -- he was EXACTLY like my brother. But no matter how coarse our banter got, up until this instance, I don't think anyone crossed the line with personal attacks.
Second, regarding Scotty calling me a : When Scotty did say the word combo we all know you can't say in poker, I told Matt Savage that I took no offense and felt no need to penalize Scotty when Matt came over to talk to him. Still, I think Matt's ruling was correct. He had told us before that the tournament was governed by TDA rules. And if you are going to play any kind of serious tournament poker you just gotta train yourself not to say certain things. As some incidents have demonstrated, controlling your explicatives can be as important as controlling your tells.
Third, regarding Scotty's reaction of walking out of the tournament: I think it was ridiculous. Not only was he walking away from a good shot at $20,000 in free money, but he was doing it on national TV! But for reasons to be discussed later, I don't think Scotty did a disservice to his team. The disservice was only to himself. Scotty has said that one of his main reasons for doing the show was to show off his talent for potential backers. Well, speaking as someone who has backed a number of players, I would really have reservations about backing someone who would just walk away from a final table over a perceived injustice with minor impact. And his complaints about, Fox Sports, UB, Annie and the others involved with the show strike me as sour grapes. I for one was treated exceptionally well by the film crew and everyone else involved . . . and I'm no UB insider. I've played fewer than 20 tournaments on that site.
Finally, lost in all of this is what effect Scotty's absence had on the actual tournament. And this is what I would really like to have some discussion about. So here is the situation:
This is a team format with three players on each team. Points are awarded by order of elimination. Each player on the team with the most points gets an entry to the Aruba Classic (value of $8,500). Also, the last eliminated player on EACH team gets a WSOP package (value of $12,000). So you could come in fourth and still win $12K if the three remaining players were all on the same team. When Scotty walked, Team Duke had to place at least first and third to win. If either Team Duke player came in fourth, Team Hellmuth won. When Scotty left, the blinds were 2K/4k w/ a 1K ante. Seat one (Team Hellmuth) had 260,000. Seat two (me, Team Duke) had 160,000. Seat three (Scotty, Team Hellmuth) had 70,00 before the penalty. Seat four (Team Duke) had 110,000.
By virtue of Scotty leaving, I was the button twice every round of four hands -- advantage me. Also, my partner often got a walk in his big blind if the reaming TH player folded -- advantage TD. Team Hellmuth had the obvious advantage of being able to put tremendous pressure on us by using Scotty's dead stack as the ultimate bubble hammer. Also, Scotty essentially handed the remaining player on his team $12,000 cash by virtue of the WSOP seat. So I'm interested in whether the poker minds out there think Scotty's move favored Team Hellmuth or Team Duke and why. I think it favored Team Hellmuth at the time, but I want to hear some of your thoughts first.
Let me know,
C00LHandNuke
Last edited by gregorio; 09-25-2008 at 03:56 AM.