Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge

11-29-2010 , 12:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashgomer
All the guys in the run it twice discussion have missed the main point. There are twice as many burn cards. The draw is more likely to hit. You are drawing to the same number of outs, but from a deck with less cards in it.
No, this is incorrect. First run through a flush draw has 9/45 and second time 9/43. If you add these together you get 18/88, which is ~20%. Running it twice almost halves your equity with a draw
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 12:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yarp
voted 1 star to balance my 1 star voting thread range
If you were more creative like durrrr with his overpairs you would mix in some 5 stars in your star value thread ranges so It wouldnt be so exploitable in easy to take advantage of it by triple ranging all your 5 star thread ranges.
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 01:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gav800
In regards to the run it twice arguement.... I think that it does favor drawing hands as it gives slightly -EV situations the chance to still split.

For example.... there was an AIPF in the last game durrrr had KK.... jungle had 99.

Jungleman was a reasonable chance to get one 9 from 10 cards rather than from 5 cards (which he got).... had they ran it once, Jungle is a significant underdog... but running it twice probably gives him a significantly higher split %
I think this is not a level? I can't tell anymore this thread has destroyed me.

This is wrong anyway. Running it twice does improve chance of splitting but it likewise reduces chances of scooping, equity is unchanged. Running it twice may still be desirable to reduce variance, god knows most people would want to in games that big, but equity is the same.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nezh
I guess the card removal effect might be slightly beneficial to the draw, as in having for example 9 out 44 the first River around with a naked flush draw versus having 9/42 the second time around. Not sure how that might impact the triple range merge though.
Same thing. Bricking the first run makes you more likely to hit the second one but hitting the first one makes you more likely to brick the second one, equity is the same.
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashgomer
All the guys in the run it twice discussion have missed the main point. There are twice as many burn cards. The draw is more likely to hit. You are drawing to the same number of outs, but from a deck with less cards in it.
See that I can tell is a level.
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 01:51 PM
I was triple range merging last night to great success in O8 sat, everyone called me an idiot, but they were just jealous.

A+ for the thread sir.

Last edited by cantloseon22; 11-29-2010 at 02:01 PM. Reason: Anyone think Nononoko was triple range merging with J5? Yes I went there.
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 01:52 PM
so much levels itt its sick
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 02:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rakemeplz
If they're triple merging their levelling range there's a 3.1415% chance they aren't even levelling at all.
Pi should be rounded, not truncated.
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 02:13 PM
so difficult to tell between those who are levelling and those who were dropped at birth
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 02:17 PM
That's very offensive. I was dropped at birth but I still know how to level on a forum
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 02:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen C
Pi should be rounded, not truncated.
here you have to double merge (sometimes triple) round pi
a double merged round is a trunk,



so pi must truncated.
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 02:26 PM
wait, so how much is 470million in USD
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 02:31 PM
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 02:40 PM
So so so good
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 02:52 PM
lol
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 02:53 PM
Can't stop watching it and laughing
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 03:04 PM
Voted 9 star as it is triple my merged voting range.
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 03:14 PM
you guys are way off. OP simply made a typo. he meant triple MARGE ranges, i.e. playing the hand according to how Marge Simpson would play it the THIRD time she was dealt it, so it's not so transparent. i trust that this will clear things up so we can lock thread now pls.

Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iseedeadmoney
Should read "Yo dawg I heard you like ranges so we put a range inside your range inside that range so you can triple merge while durrrrr runs it twice"
Spoiler:
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 04:43 PM


i obviously forgot to double my spellcheck range.

Last edited by badfilms; 11-29-2010 at 04:50 PM.
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 04:46 PM
game over. badfilms is teh winnar
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 04:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gav800
its when jungle does something because durrrr knows he would do something, so jungle does the opposite thing, but durrr knows this, so jungle does something else again, which durrr also know.... so just to make it confusing jungle does something else..... which basically means that neither player knows wtf is going on and variance is the end winner.
lol thx. sounds about right for this type of HU match. lol @ leveling^infinity xP
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 05:13 PM
1) I don't know for sure but I figure that jungleman is putting in much more prep time than durrrr is for the challenge as the money is more significant to jungle and also the glory for potential sponsorship deals.

2) It might be hard to immediately go back to playing elite A game versus elite opponent after playing fish for a month.

3) Lucky seats
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 05:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmokeyJ
No, this is incorrect. First run through a flush draw has 9/45 and second time 9/43. If you add these together you get 18/88, which is ~20%. Running it twice almost halves your equity with a draw
Wow, please ban yourself. It's like talking to 4th graders in this thread.
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 05:22 PM
can we get some examples of double and triple range merging itt
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote
11-29-2010 , 05:29 PM
i can't stop laughing
Basic reasons why Dwan is losing the Durrrr challenge Quote

      
m