Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
bannings bannings

03-05-2008 , 09:15 AM
ok, micon i can kinda understand, but druff and brandon, are u ****in serious mason, come on man, druff has contributed a lot of **** to our forums and brandon is obviously no longer a known associate of brandi whore hawbaker

just voicing my opinion, i think ur wroing in a couple spots here, neverwins a ****in piece of **** but not everyone associated with his forums is
03-05-2008 , 09:16 AM
lol u all suck imo
03-05-2008 , 09:34 AM
in before lock... But I agree.

And... I'm sure once the hits are way down that 2+2 will soften up.
03-05-2008 , 09:46 AM
Don't go away mad.

Just go away.
03-05-2008 , 09:54 AM
If Dan Druff is really banned that is ****ing ridiculous. He is an excellent poster.
03-05-2008 , 09:59 AM
what i picked up from masons posts on the whole clean 2+2 up is that it is his site and he can do what he wants. Just the way it is.

Last edited by Mike Haven; 03-05-2008 at 12:50 PM.
03-05-2008 , 10:07 AM
I totally agree about Druff. Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

And for what it's worth, Mr. Newhouse, your credibility is waning of late.

You seem to have replaced "bloodbath" and all of its conjugations with *****ed and **** and **********.

One of the reasons anyone actually took your side way back when was because you seemed like a genuinely nice and naive guy who got screwed around by some lecherous and generally crappy people.

Now you're having radio arguments and throwing things at people in public places and have decided to start talking like a tough guy.

This is not sound PR, just so you know.
03-05-2008 , 10:07 AM
micon, brandi and brandon needed to be gone. dan druff was a terrible ban
03-05-2008 , 10:14 AM
The ironic thing is that Sklansky is the one who started most of those threads that Mason is pissed about. He stirred the pot in order to get more views on this site. He even bragged about the $50,000 that he was making from it. Then when things get out of control, and Sklansky is taking heat...
03-05-2008 , 10:20 AM
Yea this is beyond absurd. Druff has been one of the best posters here for a long time. I think hes in the bottom ten percent of ban worthy people on here.

2+2 boycot until freedom?
03-05-2008 , 10:20 AM
unbann druff, in the AP scandal he was a huge contributing factor, which 2p2 benefited from
03-05-2008 , 10:21 AM
threads disappearing left and right....pretty irritating.
03-05-2008 , 10:24 AM
Unban Druff. :|
03-05-2008 , 10:25 AM
mason owns the site = he can do what he wants. TBH he just doesnt scroll nvg much or more threads would be deleted. He is pretty fair in terms of who he bans or not, he just doesnt see much of what goes on so alot of people escape his locks/bans.
03-05-2008 , 10:29 AM
isn't paul phillips still banned?
03-05-2008 , 10:47 AM
Test post
03-05-2008 , 10:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rushmore
I totally agree about Druff. Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

And for what it's worth, Mr. Newhouse, your credibility is waning of late.

You seem to have replaced "bloodbath" and all of its conjugations with *****ed and **** and **********.

One of the reasons anyone actually took your side way back when was because you seemed like a genuinely nice and naive guy who got screwed around by some lecherous and generally crappy people.

Now you're having radio arguments and throwing things at people in public places and have decided to start talking like a tough guy.

This is not sound PR, just so you know.
i speak the truth my friend, dont particularly give a **** about PR, im sorry if that offends you
03-05-2008 , 10:59 AM
sklansky needs a timeout imo
03-05-2008 , 11:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason Malmuth
I am the owner of Two Plus Two Publishing LLC of which this website is a part. The company was built around high ethical standards and the idea that our authors and associates would be treated fairly and with the goal that only the very best would make it to print.

This same philosophy carries over to this website. When certain ethical standards are repeatedly violated, those violators will not be part of this community. Our purpose here, which I have stated many times, is vigorous debate and a little bit of fun. It is not a place of insults or demeaning character attacks.

Best wishes,
I believe the above quote from another thread probably represents Managements thinking on the bannings.

I'm not saying it makes sense, just saying this seems to be their position.


Quote is from this thread:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...98#post2989198
03-05-2008 , 11:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lennie257
If Dan Druff is really banned that is ****ing ridiculous. He is an excellent poster.
This.
03-05-2008 , 11:06 AM
Personally I'm happy about the site not being all about B and B 24/7. Got old, was never very interesting, and turned 2+2 into Brandi's personal PR forum.

I don't really know Druff or why he was banned, so I can't comment about that part of the purge. But thank god the site's getting back to poker and away from two-bit poker gossip.
03-05-2008 , 11:12 AM
newhizz, i u but druff should be banned
03-05-2008 , 11:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shick
Personally I'm happy about the site not being all about B and B 24/7. Got old, was never very interesting, and turned 2+2 into Brandi's personal PR forum.

I don't really know Druff or why he was banned, so I can't comment about that part of the purge. But thank god the site's getting back to poker and away from two-bit poker gossip.
News
Views
Gossip

Um...you don't think we should have poker gossip in NVG?

What should we have? Micro-limit strategy discussion? Discussion about poker books? ...oh, wait...
03-05-2008 , 11:20 AM
Did Brandi post anything to get banned for? I know there was all this weird discussion about her and her reputed behavior was pretty strange, but I don't see what she posted that was out of line.
03-05-2008 , 11:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by HIV
newhizz, i u but druff should be banned
Can you explain why? Nothing he has written is ban-worthy. Can you quote something?

Im guessing it is his pokerbob thread that Mason didn't like...

I just want to know why people think he should be banned. Some explanation would be nice.

Last edited by Greeksquared; 03-05-2008 at 11:32 AM.

      
m