hmmm

Are you thinking about joining a table right now because it only has 2 recs? Classic bumhunter move

do you have any knowledge of this spot, or just rambling? srs question

there was a mistake in the hand barney but it wasn't the river shove, river shove is mandatory, if you don't shove river there you suck

lol - mistake located

This was one consistently readable NVG 2p2 thread.

Please dont ruin it with your fantastic in-depth poker analysis guys.

+`100000000000000000000

AQ isn't as bad as a call as you think. Ran a sim on this and 67s was losing between 1bb to 3bb and AQ was mostly breakeven (but getting called rarely), while surprisingly 88 was calling a lot and +3bb.

And OOP was x all AA and most QQ. in practice it's likely that vs a human AQ could be a better call than 67s and even 88 if OOP plays his range more aggro with more value and more bluffs than pio (and less protected x ranges). The more aggro oop plays his overpairs (while adding bluffs to balance that), better the AQ call will be and worse other bluffcatchers will be because the next value combos added to the pio strategy will be AA/QQ and AQ blocks those.

Obv if he overdefends that spot(which is easy if you don't fold most pairs and call most AQ) villain will let mma explo underbluff vs him and he will get owned.

Since the Tx on the board are Th and Td, then it makes sense for villain to call only the AQ that block QTss/QTcc/ATss/ATcc, so AQcc/AQss/AcQs/AsQc. Also always fold AQdd/AQhh/AhQd/AdQh and do whatever he wants with the other combos (maybe call AdQc/AdQs before other ones)

can someone pm me pls when all this ends

unsubbed for now

Please can you stay in your PGC and let us have this thread free of this.

If he did there'd be a giant downswing in that graph....

How hard is it for people to just not read the block of texts that you dont want to read and just skip through the thread to read hands?

I could never understand the people that beg for people to stop posting thoughts about a hand. It really isnt difficult to just skip through the thread and read hands without having to read all the posts between

+1

Harder than you’d think

Can someone tell me what that muppet Jed wrote?

"How hard is it for people to just not read the block of texts that you dont want to read and just skip through the thread to read hands?

I could never understand the people that beg for people to stop posting thoughts about a hand. It really isnt difficult to just skip through the thread and read hands without having to read all the posts between"

fwiw i ran the mma/nlz hand through the solver and 50%-30%-jam was the most frequently taken line with mma's combo

then again the solver is a bumhunting fish, i'm sure everyone in this thread is better than it

Not very hard to ignore strat talk here. But why is there different threads on this site? There's other threads to talk strategy. Otherwise we can just have one thread with all poker related things and people can just skip the things they don't want to read.

he should just c/f turn

"you are a massively winning bumhunter" is a great compliment in 2019 tbh

it is an option among others

PokerStars, Hold'em No Limit - $25/$50 - 4 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

Iimitless (UTG): $5,409.48 (108 bb)
OtB_RedBaron (BU): $5,000.00 (100 bb)
bolecc (SB): $4,048.00 (81 bb)
underO (BB): $2,000.00 (40 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($75)
Iimitless (UTG) raises to $110, OtB_RedBaron (BU) calls $110, bolecc (SB) calls $85, 1 fold

Flop: ($380) 2 9 A (3 players)
bolecc (SB) checks, Iimitless (UTG) bets $113.40, OtB_RedBaron (BU) folds, bolecc (SB) raises to $400, Iimitless (UTG) calls $286.60

Turn: ($1,180) 6 (2 players)
bolecc (SB) checks, Iimitless (UTG) bets $463.40, bolecc (SB) calls $463.40

River: ($2,106.80) K (2 players)
bolecc (SB) checks, Iimitless (UTG) bets $1,578.60, bolecc (SB) calls $1,578.60

Total pot: $5,264 (Rake: $2)

Showdown:
Iimitless (UTG) shows 2 7 (a pair of Twos)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 30%, Flop: 8%, Turn: 5%, River: 0%)

bolecc (SB) shows A 9 (two pair, Aces and Nines)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 70%, Flop: 92%, Turn: 95%, River: 100%)

bolecc (SB) wins $5,262





PokerStars, Hold'em No Limit - $25/$50 - 3 players
Replay this hand on Pokeit

Iimitless (BU): $10,916.80 (218 bb)
OtB_RedBaron (SB): $5,142.25 (103 bb)
bolecc (BB): $4,770.66 (95 bb)

Pre-Flop: ($75)
1 fold, OtB_RedBaron (SB) calls $25, bolecc (BB) raises to $175, OtB_RedBaron (SB) calls $125

Flop: ($350) 6 6 Q (2 players)
OtB_RedBaron (SB) checks, bolecc (BB) bets $104.40, OtB_RedBaron (SB) calls $104.40

Turn: ($558.80) 5 (2 players)
OtB_RedBaron (SB) checks, bolecc (BB) bets $825, OtB_RedBaron (SB) raises to $1,753.56, bolecc (BB) calls $928.56

River: ($4,065.92) 4 (2 players)
OtB_RedBaron (SB) bets $3,109.29 (all-in), bolecc (BB) calls $2,737.70 (all-in)

Total pot: $9,541.32 (Rake: $2)

Showdown:
OtB_RedBaron (SB) shows 6 A (three of a kind, Sixes)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 32%, Flop: 91%, Turn: 95%, River: 100%)

bolecc (BB) shows K K (two pair, Kings and Sixes)
(Equity - Pre-Flop: 68%, Flop: 9%, Turn: 5%, River: 0%)

OtB_RedBaron (SB) wins $9,539.32

wtf is up with limitless lately

nvm didnt realize he opened there

Iimitless?