is there any detailed information to winrates of LLinusLLove and other pros at low- and mid-stakes?
I haven't even reached low-stakes yet, but would find it interesting as somewhat of a ceiling to what to expect.
you're better off just looking at the higher winrates of the current biggest winners with a big sample, it'll be kinda similar anyway
don't know what game/s you are talking about exactly but i'd say roughly speaking unless you're talking about crazy soft/random sites, the biggest winners at most stakes 50nl+ will be roughly in the range of 5-6.5bb/100 (with a few exceptions who maybe have a bit higher, especially if playing regular tables as opposed to zoom, game-selecting hard etc). the rake is higher (bb/100 wise) the lower you go so this somewhat counteracts the softness.
at a stake like nl2/5 u can prob win 10-5bb+ or w/e if you are solid but then you would prob move up asap.
His nl200 times are long long time ago. In the last two years even shitty regulars have become much better due to solvers. And the really bad fish also got better on average due to twitch, youtube etc.
I highly doubt that the majority of regs on zoom200 has the same winrate like 3-4years ago.
If ure at 5bb/100 over a big sample at zoom 200 you're already one of the best imo
Thx guys! The old Linus-thread is really cool. I'm just half way through, but so far it seems as if his nl100 and nl200 winrates were just between 1.5 and 2.5 bb/100. That's concerning for my ambitions given that he's already such a crusher.
Btw - how do people know who the biggest winners at certain stakes are? @OMGClayDol referred to it and Linus also mentiones at one point being in the top 5 winners at his stake.