Quote:
Originally Posted by restorativejustice
I don't believe he can afford to even plead guilty to a "fine" considering that New Jersey made PStars dump a bunch of good people with a bit of dirt in their background in exchange for operating in the State. I think this matter is as bad or worse than anything those let go had ever done.
I specifically said he would pay a fine and NOT admit guilt.
Admitting guilt is a whole different level and would probably result in him being banned from the gambling industry, although that hasn't stopped Teddy Sagi from Playtech from acquiring gambling licenses in regulated jurisdictions.
The playbook for these types of crimes has been written by Wall St bankers' criminal defense attorneys. They regularly indulge in criminal behavior, pay a fine, not admit guilt, and carry on. For them, these fines are just a business expense. For example, not a single person or bank has been sent to prison for the subprime mortgage crisis that almost sunk capitalism as we know it.
Again, this is not Amaya itself being targeted, just the CEO. I know it sounds flip by saying "just the CEO" but this is a major distinction. If the company itself was being charged, then licenses could be stripped, loan covenants could be breached, and its very existence could be in doubt. That is why banks caught in wrongdoing never plead guilty, and that's why regulators don't force them too, it would cause too many negative external effects.
It's also why an analyst today said he is maintaining his $35 price target on Amaya shares.
Global Maxfin Capital analyst Manish Grigo says although he’s not surprised by the stock’s initial downside he does not believe these charges affect the fundamentals of the company. “Amaya has about 100 million poker players. They’re not going to stop playing because the CEO is under investigation,”
“PokerStars existed before Amaya bought it and PokerStars will still exist even if the management changes.