Quote:
Originally Posted by Kagome
im not sure there's a way to quantify it but i think using rta online is magnitudes worse than soft playing your horse in an mtt. it's just an opinion tho ofc
there was a thread a few months back about some young kid who binked a high roller or smt just telling his horses directly to use vision while 1-2 tabling hsplo on ACR or w/e. Pure and probably unfair speculation but i think brynn seems exactly like the kind of guy that could rationalize this to himself as well (having his horses cheat)
Cheating is cheating, if we're going to get holier-than-thou and suggest a crackdown, they should all go. I'm fine with banning Ali/Jake if there's sufficient evidence as long as Foxen and Bicknell get the ban first.
But to the extent there's poker etiquette around how bad various forms of cheating is, softplaying is absolutely considered a more egregious violation than RTA. Men Nguyen has been on the hot seat for years and banned from casinos over accusations of collusions with his "students". Meanwhile, half the coaches on run it once use HUDs, which is a form of RTA, and nobody cares. Are you seriously suggesting that very few players use push/fold charts when short stack in an online tournament? Because the vast majority of players do. And the spectrum from push/fold charts, HUDs to more advanced solver software is more of a spectrum than any sort of clear line. It's such a grey line that I would recommend avoiding online if you're not going to use any software because you are putting yourself at a massive disadvantage to the field who largely is, and has been doing so since 2004 or so.
There's one more thing, which usually when people do cheat, there's an aspect of "how likely am I to get caught." Foxen cheated when he was on video 3-handed with hole card cameras, he couldn't have been more in a position to lay low a little bit and yet he still decided to cheat in plain view. Now you're telling me this upstanding guy, who just pulled up a solver in this twitter thread to analyze a spot, would never, ever use a solver while he was playing online? Even though you could trivially get a second laptop hooked up to a cloud instance and run all the solver spots you want with absolutely no chance of being caught? Because I find the idea that the same guy who cheats while everyone is watching but would never cheat with nobody watching to be laughable.
End of the day, the chop offer is entirely irrelevant, and does not legitmize cheating after it was declined. Foxen cheated and now turns around and says we should ban cheaters, and his evidence consists of someone successfully bluffing in a spot where a solver wouldnt bluff. It's pretty telling that the same guy who would _never_ use RTA finds it suspicious when someone else doesnt play like the RTA would tell them to.
Finally, this idea that "I don't like Foxen but I give him credit for speaking up" is bullshit, because he's trying to get some of his toughest opponents banned. If Matt Savage decided to say something, that would reflect courage. Foxen doesn't get credit for "speaking out" when he has a very strong financial incentive to do so. Courage from Foxen would be takign accountability for the softplay in the tournament and forfeiting the prize money from that tournament, and either not playing in the same tournaments as Bicknell or playing against her for real.
Btw, as other noted, checking down with an all-in player is an ICM play plus more often than not it's an empty side pot there's no incentive to steal. Another misdirection that anybody who knows poker should recognize as bullshit.