Quote:
Originally Posted by Mason Malmuth
I agree that Nagy looks somewhat bad given the way he has handled this. But by handling it this way he has made Little look quite bad. Specifically, Little has claimed that he only said he was warning his viewers to be careful playing on an unregulated site. But other posters have stated that Little was constantly being critical of ACR for many reasons. And, if this was the case, it makes Little appear untruthful and not trustworthy. Perhaps this is what Nagy wanted and he was willing to pay the price to do this.
Mason
I have read carefully and do not understand what, if anything, your criticism of Little is in the ACR situation. I also do not see why you / 2+2 management didn't like him prior to this situation arising, even though you appear to be attempting to explain it in a couple posts in this thread.
In no way does Little come off looking untruthful or untrustworthy from this incident, or this thread. The fact that you think he does, and the fact that you don't like him but have not clearly articulated a reason why, really makes me think you are biased against him, whether you see it or not.
You mentioned more than once that risk/reward is a personal decision (I'm paraphrasing of course). Do you think Little ever said it was not a personal decision? When asked his opinion and he more or less said ACR was safe enough to play on, but don't store more money there than necessary (and it
is NOT safer than a bank, even though one of their paid spokespeople said it was) do you think he was giving bad advice, or that he was wrong, or that it was bad for poker? Are you implying he should have said, "that is a personal decision" and limited his answer to that only?