Quote:
Originally Posted by borg23
Gl but it would be aburd if they gave you money back that you lost
I'm not sure how I stand here morally/ethically. The money he, or anyone, used to play high stakes after BF, was essentially worthless after BF. There was literally nobody that could foresee remission taking place after 6 years.
So if the gouvernement draws the line on the specific BF date as to what they are going to pay out, it would actually make a lot of sense for him to get his 'money back', as it was only actual 'money' before BF.
Now you could of course argue that the money was worthless way before BF as AP/UB were a scam anyway. But the gouvernement HAS to pick a specific date to determine what people were 'owed'. If they set that date on the literal BF date..he's owed that money. Because the money became worthless on that specific date. And the guy that won his worthless balance post BF shouldn't get a penny of that money, as it wasn't 'money'. It were worthless numbers on a screen.
#wasstartingasdevilsadvocatebutthemoreitypethemore ibelieveitmyself