Quote:
Originally Posted by AJackson
A nuanced debate is very valuable. You present a backed up position, someone makes a backed up critic, you respond, and people leave the discussion better informed.
But that isn't what is happening here.
For the most part, people of your mindset spend a few seconds posting things they heard and then leave it to other people to do the heavy lifting to prove it untrue.
When proven untrue the low effort poster will usually either ignore or feign ignorance, 'oh, ok it was just something I heard.'
Generally the next step is more no effort posting of things they've heard which requires minimum 10x the effort to debunk.
It's a war of attrition that the low effort poster will eventual win. Without fairly strict moderation the platform becomes a cesspool.
In my experience 99% of the time someone claims free discussion is being stifled by SJW snowflakes/Marxists/libtards/etc it's either what I've described above or some racist/sexist bullshit that they somehow don't think is racist/sexist.
so much this. That's their whole agenda, just shovel mountains and mountains of **** because it takes 10x as long to respond to some stupid claim than it does for them to come up with it, and then when it's shown to be **** it still doesn't matter because whatever or you get the "hey, I'm just asking questions!" nonsense.
Then they turn into huge snowflakes if their harmful falsehoods aren't allowed to stand, and they cry all over the internet about leftist tech giants and moderators and how there is no free speech anymore. Meanwhile any platform they create to echo chamber their nonsense implodes on itself because a sizeable portion of people who think the same way they do about lots of this stuff are also disgusting, vile humans and no one wants to be around any of that, so they always come running back to the same platforms they say they can't stand, because they have a victim complex and need to feel persecuted and wronged.