Prahlad calls out Haxton and Bonomo for account sharing - Page 6 - Poker News

To the best of my knowledge, all three sites in question (Stars, FTP, Cereus) acknowledge that there is no one player to a hand rule online. Prah however isn't accusing us of talking strategy, ghosting, or coaching.

That part is hilarious, ike should hire some homeless guys he would coach to play vs pra.

Quote

03-13-2011 , 06:35 AM

#128

rich99cook

banned

Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 2,124

Does Prahlad Friedman have/regularly post on a 2+2 account?

Quote

03-13-2011 , 06:35 AM

#129

epcfast

veteran

Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 2,535

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZeeJustin

high stakes communities' code of ethics .

Good post apart from the oxymoron.
On another point - how do you feel about the treatment JJ Prodigy?

Quote

03-13-2011 , 06:45 AM

#130

MicroRoller

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 2,533

Forgive me if this is a stupid question but if Friedman understood Haxton's game as well as he's implying wouldn't that give him an edge and wouldn't he want to play him?

Quote

03-13-2011 , 06:50 AM

#131

thoth_hermes

adept

Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 803

Prahlad is a douche. It sounds like he's ranting, but even if he were being cheated I would enjoy it. At the worst, this whole issue is a wash for me.

Quote

03-13-2011 , 06:51 AM

#132

4k4sh777

adept

Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 828

u cant just make such serious allegations against someone without some sort of concrete evidence. got any information you would like to share to substantiate such claims?

Quote

03-13-2011 , 06:58 AM

#133

toocrispy

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 4,089

Im kinda surprised that ike and justin didnt respond sooner. I can understand if justin is on vacation atm, but ike should prob respond too. Like there is a <1% chance he hasnt heard about this now right?

Quote

03-13-2011 , 06:59 AM

#134

pettman18

grinder

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 543

posted by prahlad on twitter

Quote

03-13-2011 , 07:01 AM

#135

madlex

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 17,440

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZeeJustin

As for the UB account accusations, I have a few things to say. First of all, if Prah actually did know the true owner of the account, it would be extremely unprofessional and a violation of customers' expectation of privacy for him to out another player's identity. If this were shown to be the case, it would be clearly unnaccaptebal on not only Prah's behalf, but also on UB's.

If Prah gets account related information from UB, that would be the real scandal here.

Quote

03-13-2011 , 07:19 AM

#136

nophun

journeyman

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 378

Quote:

Originally Posted by pettman18

posted by prahlad on twitter

Quote:

Originally Posted by immadeadbird

this wont matter. its villain dependent ducy?

ICYDU?

Quote

03-13-2011 , 07:28 AM

#137

WEED LIMIT OMAHA

enthusiast

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 75

they should just solve it with a duel like in the good ole days. duel > twitter

Quote

03-13-2011 , 07:31 AM

#138

HocusPokus

journeyman

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 287

Does Prahlad not play Ike?
Why?

Quote

03-13-2011 , 07:37 AM

#139

FatalError

Fantasy Site Rep

Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 8,184

Quote:

Originally Posted by WEED LIMIT OMAHA

they should just solve it with a duel like in the good ole days. duel > twitter

thats basically what HU4ROLLS is

Quote

03-13-2011 , 08:02 AM

#140

soapdodger

adept

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,079

Quote:

Originally Posted by ZeeJustin

To the best of my knowledge, all three sites in question (Stars, FTP, Cereus) acknowledge that there is no one player to a hand rule online....

As for the UB account accusations, I have a few things to say. First of all, if Prah actually did know the true owner of the account...

As for the side accusation of Isaac playing Prahlad against his will: Isaac has the right to anonymity so long as he follows the site's ToS. There would be nothing wrong with this behavior IMHO.

i think prahlad has handled this very badly, thrown around alot of **** and has basically blown up. i also have zero respect for UB. BUT ZJ's comments here logically entails that Isaac could 'ghost' the 'true owner' of an account to get heads up action vs prahlad completely 'ethically'. hypothetically of course

Quote

03-13-2011 , 08:20 AM

#141

YouGotPLOWned

journeyman

Join Date: Feb 2009 Posts: 333

Quote:

To the best of my knowledge, all three sites in question (Stars, FTP, Cereus) acknowledge that there is no one player to a hand rule online

Quote

03-13-2011 , 08:27 AM

#142

Zima421

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 18,973

Quote:

Originally Posted by FatalError

because most high stakes poker players don't air their **** on twitter and 2p2, which is one of the major issues with how prah handled this, it's a definite major breach of expected behavior by those as high profile as he is to have gone about this so publicly with so little evidence.

makes sense, but...

if prahlad was spreading baseless rumors about myself (if i was in ZJ/Ike's shoes) i would want to clear it up. I suppose it could cause a slippery slope and just result in mud slinging back and forth, but ZJ's response seems to take care of all of that.

I also think its a bit dif when you are calling out ZJ for multi-accounting/whatever. he has a history of it.

Quote

03-13-2011 , 08:39 AM

#143

heater

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 11,407

prahlad gonna prahlad

he's been a tiltmonkey drama queen forever

Quote

03-13-2011 , 08:48 AM

#144

MicroRoller

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 2,533

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zima421

obv zeejustin and ike know of this thread.

why arent them commenting...?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zima421

Uhh.. this started late yesterday. Saturday night. I't snow early sunday morning, about 12 hours after this was first posted.

Maybe they have lives, go out or possibly like to sleep and not spend all day reading 2+2?

Quote

03-13-2011 , 09:03 AM

#145

JPE23

old hand

Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 1,517

Even if Prahlad is coming across douchey, I hope his accusations don't go without being investigated.

Quote

03-13-2011 , 09:11 AM

#146

HocusPokus

journeyman

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 287

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPE23

Even if Prahlad is coming across douchey, I hope his accusations don't go without being investigated.

lol.
should we "investigate" every baseless claim in the world?

especially claims made by people who have a history of shooting angles and making false accusations on tv.

Quote

03-13-2011 , 09:19 AM

#147

JPE23

old hand

Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 1,517

Quote:

Originally Posted by HocusPokus

lol.
should we "investigate" every baseless claim in the world?

especially claims made by people who have a history of shooting angles and making false accusations on tv.

How is it baseless when we know Bonomo is a known MA'er?

Quote

03-13-2011 , 09:34 AM

#148

RolloTomasi

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 3,086

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoahSD

He just publicly accused two people of cheating. Doing that with no evidence or almost no evidence is super ****ing scummy.

learned to whine from UB pro Phil Hellmuth ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by apefish

it's like sebok gave him twitter lessons

UB pros gotta stick together

Quote:

Originally Posted by HocusPokus

Dude, he WRONGLY accused Lisandro of not posting a blind and angling on national television. Lisandro was on ESPN for all the world to see, and Prahlad ignorantly and wrongly called him a cheater. That crosses so many lines. Bottom line, you don't spew baseless accusations of pure speculation in a public forum (especially on national television). It's dead wrong.

He has zero proof of ZJ or Ike, or anyone, colluding against him, and you don't throw someone's reputation under the bus unless you can back it up with concrete facts. Otherwise, stfu.

paranoia from playing Russ Hamilton itt

Quote:

Originally Posted by aejones

lolprahlalalala

FYP

Quote:

Originally Posted by kevinb1983

so much drama in the LBC...

LesbianBiCommunity

Quote:

Originally Posted by advidtruth

Prahlad has a lot of balls to call out Ike and Bonomo when his crime is so much worse. Not just talking about him incorrectly calling out Lissandro, or spewing his vegan brotherhood hippie crap, but what he did to his once close friend and backer is as slimy as it gets. Years ago Erik and Prahlad were really good friends and Erik backed him. They discussed strategy together all the time and really helped each other get better. Then Prahlad gets a hold of some money and sits down in a game on UB under an anonymous account to play against Erik heads up. Do you deny this Prahlad? What excuse could you possibly have for doing that? This kid is so self righteous he's quick to call others out for being sellouts by taking online money and the minute he's hard up for cash he signs with UB of all places. You sir are a complete phony.

tnx 4 poasting EDOG

Quote:

Originally Posted by HocusPokus

Does Prahlad not play Ike? Why?

math is overrated ?

Quote

03-13-2011 , 09:46 AM

#149

HocusPokus

journeyman

Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 287

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPE23

How is it baseless when we know Bonomo is a known MA'er?

"Bonomo multi-accounted five years ago, so him and Ike have to be sharing an account now because...uhh... I just have a feeling. Let me post it on Twitter".

You seriously can't understand how that claim has no merit? What particular concrete evidence does Prahlad have to accuse Bonomo and Ike of sharing an account?

Also, where the **** were Prahlad's acclaimed detective skills when he was being funneled for millions by superusers over a year span?

Last edited by HocusPokus; 03-13-2011 at 09:58 AM.